No. 20-654
Anthony John Ripa v. Stony Brook University
Response WaivedRelisted (2)
Tags: civil-rights denied-benefit educational-amendments educational-amendments-1972 gender-advocacy sex-discrimination standing statutory-interpretation student-benefits title-ix
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity DueProcess Trademark JusticiabilityDoctri
SocialSecurity DueProcess Trademark JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2021-03-05
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether discrimination for a student because of sex constitutes a 'denied ... benefit' to the other sex within the meaning of Title IX of the Educational Amendments of 1972, 20 U.S.C. § 1681-1688, or at all
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether discrimination for a student because of sex constitutes a “denied ... benefit” to the other sex within the meaning of Title IX of the Educational Amendments of 1972, 20 U.S.C. § 1681-1688, or at all. 2. Whether a gender advocacy department for one sex constitutes a “denied ... benefit” to the other sex within the meaning of Title IX of the Educational Amendments of 1972, 20 U.S.C. § 1681-1688, or at all.
Docket Entries
2021-03-08
Rehearing DENIED.
2021-02-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/5/2021.
2021-02-05
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2021-01-11
Petition DENIED.
2020-12-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.
2020-12-14
Waiver of right of respondent Stony Brook University to respond filed.
2020-11-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 14, 2020)
Attorneys
Anthony John Ripa
Anthony John Ripa — Petitioner
Stony Brook University
Barbara Dale Underwood — Solicitor General, Respondent