No. 20-6756
David Ray Wallace v. United States
Tags: criminal-law criminal-statute due-process habeas-corpus physical-force reckless-conduct sentencing successive-motion texas-robbery violent-crime
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2021-04-23
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Texas robbery has 'the use of physical force against the person of another' as an element
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether Texas robbery—an offense that can be committed by recklessly causing injury or by placing the victim in fear of injury—has “the use of physical force against the person of another” as an element. 2. Whether reasonable jurists could debate the district court’s decision to dismiss Mr. Wallace’s authorized successive motion to vacate. i
Docket Entries
2021-04-26
Petition DENIED.
2021-04-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/23/2021.
2021-03-19
Memorandum of respondent United States filed.
2021-03-03
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including March 19, 2021.
2021-03-02
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 5, 2021 to March 19, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-01-29
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 5, 2021.
2021-01-28
Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 3, 2021 to March 5, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-12-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 3, 2021)
Attorneys
David Ray Wallace
James Matthew Wright — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent