No. 20-6834
Cynthia Holmes v. Xavier Becerra, Secretary of Health and Human Services
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process health-privacy healthcare-compliance HIPAA hipaa-privacy medical-privacy patient-rights physician-liability state-law state-law-preemption
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess Securities HealthPrivacy Privacy
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess Securities HealthPrivacy Privacy
Latest Conference:
2021-03-05
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether HIPAA's Privacy Rule is unconstitutional as applied by respondents
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED As applied by respondents in this case and in its ongoing pattern and practice, HIPAA’s Privacy Rule cannot pass constitutional muster; respondents’ wrongdoing violates the HIPAA Privacy Rule, deprives patients of more stringent privacy rights under applicable state law, and places physicians, including the petitioner, in the untenable position of violating applicable local privacy law in order to be paid for medically necessary services rendered in good faith without prior notice and without just cause.
Docket Entries
2021-05-26
Case considered closed.
2021-03-08
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until March 29, 2021, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a).
2021-02-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/5/2021.
2021-02-10
Waiver of right of respondent Norris Cochran, Acting Secretary of Health and Human Services to respond filed.
2020-10-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 10, 2021)
Attorneys
Xavier Becerra, Secretary of Health and Human Services
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent