hipaa-privacy

5 cases — ← All topics

Case Title Lower Court Docketed Status Flags Tags Question Presented
25-65 Royal Suites Health Care & Rehabilitation, et al. v. Joseph S. Ingemi, Jr. New Jersey 2025-07-18 Denied Response Waived discovery-rules healthcare-litigation hipaa-privacy individually-identifiable-information medical-records patient-confidentiality Whether the patient privacy provisions of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 1320d, et seq., and its regula…
24-5099 Brandan C. Bellamy v. Chanse Houghton, et al. Eighth Circuit 2024-07-17 Denied IFP civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process hipaa hipaa-privacy malicious-prosecution privacy section-1983 standing summary-dismissal Whether Petitioner should be given another chance to make another amended complaint
21-1510 David P. Marana v. Merit Systems Protection Board Federal Circuit 2022-06-01 Denied Response Waived civil-procedure civil-rights commander-authority due-process hipaa-privacy military-discretion reasonable-person-standard redacted-evidence standing subculture-interpretation whistleblower-retaliation whistleblowing What court, tribunal, and or investigative agency ensures that information with redacted information when presented as evidence is valid, legal, and n…
21-1289 Foster Taft v. Ventura County Medical Center, et al. Ninth Circuit 2022-03-24 Denied Response Waived 42-usc-1983 civil-rights due-process federal-regulation hipaa hipaa-privacy privacy privacy-act private-cause-of-action private-right-of-action state-actor Does 42 U.S.C. §1983 confer a private cause of action for privacy violations of HIPAA, in particular 164.502(a)?
20-6834 Cynthia Holmes v. Xavier Becerra, Secretary of Health and Human Services Fourth Circuit 2021-01-11 Denied Response WaivedIFP civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process health-privacy healthcare-compliance HIPAA hipaa-privacy medical-privacy patient-rights physician-liability state-law state-law-preemption Whether HIPAA's Privacy Rule is unconstitutional as applied by respondents