Whether Petitioner should be given another chance to make another amended complaint

No question identified. : oo gE, : i © QUESTION(S)’ PRESENTED: .1. Whether Petitioner should be given another chance to make another amended complaint. 2. Whether Respondents shall be held liable for violating Petitioner's : Constitutional Rights and for participation in Malicious Prosecution of Petitioner. 3. Whether Respondents. and additional Defendants should be held liable for violation of Petitioner's Hipaa Privacy Rights and other Prilvacy Laws. ; 4. Whether Petitioner's Lawsuit should be considered a Malictious Prosecution case or something else rather than a Wrongful Arrest case. ' 5, Whether the Court should reevaluate Petitiloner’s 1983 Lawsuit and ' allow it to move forward since Petitioner's pending charges that was . argued in this Lawsuit has been Dismissed with Prosecution entering (Nolle Prosequi) 1 month after Petittloner's Lawsuit was Summarily; Dismissed by the Distrilct Court on 09-18-23. ; 6. Whether Defendants Kelly Puckett, Wright Memorilal Hospital, and Trenton Missouri Police Department should be SEVERED and DISMISSED : from this case cosidering the fact that Petitioner misunderstood Judge FERNANDO J. GAITAN, JR“s Order in Document 4directing }Plaintifé : to file a superseding amended complaint due to deficiencies in his orliginal complaint. : . i