No. 20-6889
Gregory Bartunek v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 4th-amendment constitutional-law criminal-procedure due-process habeas-corpus internet-protocol overbreadth search-warrant standing vagueness
Key Terms:
DueProcess Privacy
DueProcess Privacy
Latest Conference:
2021-02-19
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the federal rules of criminal procedure are unconstitutionally overbroad and vague
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED I. WHETHER THE FEDERAL RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE ARE UNCONSTITUTIONALLY OVERBROAD AND VAGUE II. WHETHER WARRANTS BASED ON INTERNET PROTOCOL ADDRESSES SHOULD BE TREATED LIKE INFORMANT'S TIPS TO POLICE i
Docket Entries
2021-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2021-02-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.
2021-01-26
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-12-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 16, 2021)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent