No. 20-7271

Ramon A. Boyce v. Ohio

Lower Court: Ohio
Docketed: 2021-02-26
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: 4th-amendment illinois-v-caballes k9-deployment rodriguez-v-united-states search-and-seizure traffic-stop
Latest Conference: 2021-04-23
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the rule in Illinois v. Caballes, 543 U.S. 405, 135 S.Ct. 834, 160 L.Ed. 2d 842 applies to the deployment of a K9 during a traffic stop

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED | TF the mission of @ traffic Stop 19 Completed does Tinois v. Coloolles $43 US. 405,135 S.ch 834, 160 L.Ed. 2d B42 have. an application to that Stop Conceming Yhe deployment of a KF? . When Concamning K% degloyment during a traltic Stop which case Contras linois V. Coloalles 543 U.S. 405, 135° 3.c4 834, 160 L.Ed. 24 S42, or Rodriguez, v. Und Shes S75 U.S. 348.2 , ‘ .

Docket Entries

2021-04-26
Petition DENIED.
2021-04-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/23/2021.
2021-02-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 29, 2021)

Attorneys

Ramon A. Boyce
Ramon A. Boyce — Petitioner
Ramon A. Boyce — Petitioner