No. 20-7671
Ronald E. Johnson v. Derek Schmidt, Attorney General of Kansas, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-review criminal-procedure due-process kansas-supreme-court mandatory-minimums mandatory-sentencing sentencing sentencing-modification sixth-amendment statutory-interpretation sua-sponte
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2021-05-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was Astorga v. Kansas remanded back to the Kansas Supreme Court for the purpose of correcting with the Mandatory Sentence modification of Hard 40/50 provisions in the Sua Sponte K.S.A. 21-4639 and K.S.A. 21-6628(c)?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. :
Docket Entries
2021-09-10
Rehearing DENIED.
2021-08-19
DISTRIBUTED.
2021-06-07
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2021-06-01
Petition DENIED.
2021-05-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/27/2021.
2021-04-23
Waiver of right of respondent Derek Schmidt to respond filed.
2021-03-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 6, 2021)
Attorneys
Derek Schmidt
Brant M. Laue — Solicitor General of Kansas, Respondent
Brant M. Laue — Solicitor General of Kansas, Respondent