Dallas Jerome Wims v. United States
HabeasCorpus Securities
Whether the First Step Act's amendment redefining 'serious drug offense' applies to the ACCA
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. WHETHER THE FIRST STEP ACT’S AMENDMENT REDEFINING “SERIOUS DRUG OFFENSE” FOR PURPOSES OF AN ENHANCEMENT FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE ACT (21 U.S.C. 801 ET SEQ) APPLIES TO THE ACCA.(18 U.S.C. 924(E)(1). 2. WHETHER SENTENCING PETITIONER UNDER THE ACCA VIOLATED THE EIGHTH AMENDMENT. i IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES DALLAS WIMS, Petitioner, -VSsUNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this 12th day of March, 2021, in accordance with Rule 33 of the Rules of the Supreme Court of the United States, copies of the (1) Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis, (2) Petition for Writ of Certiorari, and (3) Certificate of Service, were served upon the United States Attorney’s Office, 99 N.E. Fourth St., Miami, FL 33128; and upon the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. 20530, by mail. /s/ Charles G. White CHARLES G. WHITE, ESQ. Counsel for Petitioner 1031 Ives Dairy Road, Suite 228 Miami, FL 33179 Tel: (305) 914-0160 Florida Bar No. 334170 i