No. 20-8156
Ricardo Renteria v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure constitutional-rights fourth-amendment law-enforcement probable-cause reasonable-suspicion specific-facts statute-violation traffic-stop
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy
Latest Conference:
2021-06-24
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether reasonable suspicion to support a traffic stop under the Fourth Amendment requires a showing of specific facts that the suspect violated the relevant statute
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether reasonable suspicion to support a traffic stop under the Fourth Amendment requires a showing of specific facts that the suspect violated the relevant statute. --prefix-
Docket Entries
2021-06-28
Petition DENIED.
2021-06-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/24/2021.
2021-06-03
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2021-05-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due June 28, 2021)
Attorneys
Ricardo Renteria
Timothy Allen Scott — Singleton Schreiber McKenzie & Scott, LLP, Petitioner
Timothy Allen Scott — Singleton Schreiber McKenzie & Scott, LLP, Petitioner
United States of America
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent