No. 20-8180
Benjamin Ross v. United States
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: 4th-amendment 4th-amendment-violation fourth-amendment pretextual-stop probable-cause reasonable-suspicion rodriguez-precedent rodriguez-v-united-states traffic-stop
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2021-11-19
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Fourth Amendment requires reasonable, articulable suspicion and probable cause to justify a pretextual traffic stop?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS FOR REVIEW NO. 1 WHETHER THE FOURTH AMENDMENT REQUIRES REASONABLE, ARTICULABLE SUSPICION AND PROBABLE CAUSE TO JUSTIFY A PRETEXTUAL TRAFFIC STOP? NO. 2. WHETHER REASONABLE SUSPICION OF CRIMINAL ACTIVITY AND PETITIONERS NERVOUSNESS JUSTIFY DETAINING, PAT SEARCHING, AND HAVING DRUG DOG SNIFF PETITIONERS VEHICLE VIOLATE THE. SUPREME COURT'S RULING IN RODRIGUEZ ¥. UNITED STATES, AND WHETHER THE PROLONGED DETENTION VIOLATED THE FOURTH AMENDMENT? . ; : , | 4 Oe eo e .
Docket Entries
2021-11-22
Rehearing DENIED.
2021-11-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/19/2021.
2021-10-20
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-06-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-06-09
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-05-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 1, 2021)
Attorneys
Benjamin Ross
Benjamin Ross — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent