No. 20-8251
Jayrionte Thomas v. West Virginia
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-appeal criminal-procedure due-process first-degree-murder habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance legal-procedure right-to-counsel sixth-amendment west-virginia-law
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
HabeasCorpus Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2021-09-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)
ineffective-assistance-of-counsel
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
ISSUE PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals erred in declining to hold, on direct criminal appeal, that the Petitioner received ineffective assistance of counsel in a First-Degree Murder case.
Docket Entries
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-07-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-06-24
Waiver of right of respondent State of West Virginia to respond filed.
2021-05-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 8, 2021)
Attorneys
Jayrionte Thomas
Matthew A. Victor — 1319 Quarrier Street, Petitioner
Matthew A. Victor — 1319 Quarrier Street, Petitioner
State of West Virginia
Lindsay Sara See — Office of the West Virginia Attorney General, Respondent
Lindsay Sara See — Office of the West Virginia Attorney General, Respondent