Whether law enforcement violated Edwards v. Arizona by interrogating a minor who invoked the Fifth Amendment, and whether claims for declaratory and monetary relief can be certified under Rule 23(c)(3)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. Whether Teacher, officers, law enforcement violate the rule announced in Edwards v. : "Arizona by interviewing, interrogated, unreasonable searches False Imprisonment a 6-year old minor (heterosexuality Straight), gender black male who has previously invoked the Fifth Amendment right to his father and counsel, under what circumstances does the custodial detainee "initiate" further communications with law enforcement and thereby purge the taint from the Edwards violation, and using his or her official title position while engaged in political activity Hatch Act. Under Title IX the Education Amendments of 1972 prohibits discrimination based on sex in education, discharge though an adversary proceeding commenced by filing a grievances/ complaint mailing by the clerk of the court, serving, it summons on an appropriate agent of respondents. When does such procedure meet the | rigorous demands of due process and entitle the resalting order to respect under principles of res judicata and thereby purge taint from the Petition Clause First Amendment,? | 2. Whether claims for declaration, injunctive monetary, punitive damages relief can be certified | under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 23(c)(3) the binding effect of a class judgment on members under which by its terms to injunctive or corresponding declaratory relief. Under Rute 60(b) as a remedial provision is to be “liberally construed for the purpose of doing substantial justice,” Patton v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 25 F.3d 1021, 1030 (Fed. Cir. 1994) Timing of Rule 60(b) Motions. When does a State Judge, Magi strate Judge have authority to preside over a case when He/She has a conflict of interest? Does absolute immunity apply when a judge, public officer, lawyers, law enforcement has acted criminally under color of law and without jurisdiction, as well as actions taken in an administrative capacity to influence cases? Can a judge, public officer, lawyers, Act of Congress have Immunity for their non judicial activities who knowingly violate civil right act 1871? |