No. 20-8461

In Re Richard Charles Lussy

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2021-06-30
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: civil-rights civil-torts due-process federal-questions jury-trial mandamus ministerial-mandamus oath-of-office public-charge standing
Key Terms:
Antitrust DueProcess Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2022-02-18 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the petitioner has a clear legal duty for the Chief Justice to perform a ministerial mandamus act, despite the respondents' alleged errors and violations of rules, and whether the petitioner is entitled to amend the complaint with the support of a competent lawyer

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

LIST OF ALL PARTIES JOINED rue 14.1@)¢) KNOWN TO PROCEEDING: ruts 12.3 . Rule 12.4 All Joined Different Parties in Bold Italics directly related Rule 14.1(b)(3 Parent case RC. “Rick” Lussy (“RICK”) Petitioner /Appellant Pro Se . VERSUS Henry Paumie Lussy, Launa Lynn Roque, Jenahlee Murie Bornff; Merna Green Assessors Office , Montana Department of Revenue; Tim Fox Montana Attorney General; Wade J. Dahood, Jeffrey Wade Dahood Individually, Knight & Dahood Law Firm; Jeremiah C. Lynch U.S. Magistrate and Jeremiah : C. Lynch Individually; Brian M. Morris Article HI U.S. Judge, Tyler Gilman, Clerk of U.S. District Court; Judge Murguia, Judge Christen, Judge Bade & Molly C. Dwyer Clerk of Ninth District ~ Court of A

Docket Entries

2022-02-22
Rehearing DENIED. The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2022-01-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/18/2022.
2021-10-12
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED. The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2021-08-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-05-12
Petition for a writ of mandamus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due July 30, 2021)

Attorneys

Richard Lussy
Richard Charles Lussy — Petitioner
Richard Charles Lussy — Petitioner