| 22-234 |
Texas, et al. v. Cook County, Illinois, et al. |
Seventh Circuit |
2022-09-13 |
Denied |
|
administrative-law civil-procedure due-process executive-power federal-rule immigration intervention judicial-procedure litigation-strategy public-charge standing |
Whether petitioners were entitled to intervene in defense of the Rule |
| 20-8461 |
In Re Richard Charles Lussy |
|
2021-06-30 |
Denied |
Relisted (2)IFP |
civil-rights civil-torts due-process federal-questions jury-trial mandamus ministerial-mandamus oath-of-office public-charge standing |
Whether the petitioner has a clear legal duty for the Chief Justice to perform a ministerial mandamus act, despite the respondents' alleged errors and… |
| 20-1776 |
Owen Marlon Alexander v. Breaking Ground, et al. |
Second Circuit |
2021-06-23 |
Denied |
|
administrative-procedure agency-deference civil-procedure civil-rights double-jeopardy due-process guardianship immigration-law intervention public-charge rule-making standing Whether States with interests should be permitted |
Question not identified |
| 20-962 |
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco, California, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2021-01-21 |
Dismissed |
|
administrative-procedure administrative-rulemaking homeland-security immigration-law immigration-nationality-act inadmissibility notice-and-comment public-charge standing statutory-interpretation |
Whether entities that are not subject to the public-charge ground of inadmissibility are proper parties to challenge the final rule |
| 20-449 |
Department of Homeland Security, et al. v. New York, et al. |
Second Circuit |
2020-10-08 |
Granted |
Relisted (3) |
administrative-law administrative-procedure agency-rulemaking homeland-security immigration-law immigration-nationality-act judicial-review notice-and-comment public-charge standing |
Whether entities that are not subject to the public-charge ground of inadmissibility are proper parties to challenge the final rule |
| 20-450 |
Alejandro N. Mayorkas, Secretary of Homeland Security, et al. v. Cook County, Illinois, et al. |
Seventh Circuit |
2020-10-08 |
Dismissed |
Relisted (3) |
administrative-law administrative-procedure homeland-security immigration-law immigration-nationality-act inadmissibility notice-and-comment notice-and-comment-rulemaking public-charge standing statutory-interpretation |
Whether entities that are not subject to the public-charge ground of inadmissibility are proper parties to challenge the final rule |