No. 20-88

HZNP Finance Limited, et al. v. Actavis Laboratories UT, Inc.

Lower Court: Federal Circuit
Docketed: 2020-07-29
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)
Tags: 35-usc-112 claim-construction consisting-essentially-of nautilus-v-biosig patent patent-act patent-claim patent-validity reasonable-certainty statutory-interpretation transitional-phrase
Key Terms:
Antitrust Patent JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2020-10-30 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the 'basic and novel properties' identified in connection with a patent claim's transitional phrase 'consisting essentially of' must independently satisfy the requirements of 35 U.S.C. § 112, § 2, of the Patent Act, and the accompanying 'reasonable certainty' standard set forth in Nautilus, Inc. v. Biosig Instruments Inc., 134 S. Ct. 2120 (2014)

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the “basic and novel properties” identified in connection with a patent claim’s transitional phrase “consisting essentially of’ must independently satisfy the requirements of 35 U.S.C. § 112, § 2, of the Patent Act, and the accompanying “reasonable certainty” standard set forth in Nautilus, Inc. v. Biosig Instruments Inc., 134 S. Ct. 2120 (2014). i

Docket Entries

2020-11-02
Petition DENIED. Justice Barrett took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2020-10-22
Reply of petitioners Hznp Finance Limited, et al. filed. (Distributed)
2020-10-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/30/2020.
2020-09-30
Brief of respondent Actavis Laboratories UT, Inc. in opposition filed.
2020-08-31
Response Requested. (Due September 30, 2020)
2020-08-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-08-11
Waiver of right of respondent Actavis Laboratories UT, Inc. to respond filed.
2020-07-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 28, 2020)

Attorneys

Actavis Laboratories UT, Inc.
John Christopher RozendaalSterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C., Respondent
Hznp Finance Limited, et al.
Caryn Carson Borg-BreenGreen, Griffith & Borg-Breen, LLP, Petitioner