patent-claim
11 cases — ← All topics
| Case | Title | Lower Court | Docketed | Status | Flags | Tags | Question Presented |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24A485 | Impact Engine, Inc. v. Google LLC | Federal Circuit | 2024-11-15 | Presumed Complete | alice-framework means-plus-function patent-claim patent-eligibility section-101 section-112 | Whether the interpretation of 35 U.S.C. § 101 patent eligibility requires consideration of the specific structural limitations defined under 35 U.S.C.… | |
| 23-185 | HIP, Inc. v. Hormel Foods Corporation | Federal Circuit | 2023-08-29 | Denied | 35-usc-116 conception-standard federal-circuit federal-circuit-interpretation joint-invention joint-inventorship patent patent-claim patent-inventorship patent-specification statutory-construction | Whether joint inventorship requires anything more than a contribution to conception that is stated in a patent claim | |
| 23-190 | Probir K. Bondyopadhyay v. United States | Federal Circuit | 2023-08-29 | Denied | Response WaivedRelisted (3) | civil-rights due-process fifth-amendment government-liability jurisdictional-conflict patent patent-claim perjury sovereign-immunity statutory-interpretation takings | Can the USCFC dismiss a Fifth Amendment property claim arising from the admitted unauthorized use of a patented U.S. invention by the U.S.A.? |
| 22-822 | Avery Dennison Corporation v. ADASA Inc. | Federal Circuit | 2023-03-01 | Denied | Amici (2)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) | 35-usc-101 binary-encoding most-significant-bits patent-claim patent-eligibility rfid rfid-technology section-101 serial-number | Whether the patent claim, by subdividing a serial number into 'most significant bits' that are assigned such that they remain identical across RFID ta… |
| 21-811 | Yanbin Yu, et al. v. Apple Inc., et al. | Federal Circuit | 2021-12-01 | Denied | Response Waived | claim-construction diamond-v-diehr federal-circuit mayo-test mayo-v-prometheus parker-v-flook patent-claim patent-claims patent-eligibility point-of-novelty | Whether patent claims should be considered 'as a whole' or only the 'point of novelty' in determining patent eligibility |
| 21-457 | ENCO Systems, Inc. v. DaVincia, LLC | Federal Circuit | 2021-09-27 | Denied | Response Waived | 35-usc-101 abstract-idea federal-circuit patent patent-claim patent-eligibility patent-protection patent-system section-101 | What is the appropriate standard for determining whether a patent claim is directed to a patent-ineligible concept when determining whether an inventi… |
| 20-1760 | iLife Technologies, Inc. v. Nintendo of America, Inc. | Federal Circuit | 2021-06-17 | Denied | 35-usc-101 claim-interpretation judicial-framework legal-standard patent patent-claim patent-eligibility question-of-fact question-of-law section-101 standard | What is the appropriate standard for determining patent-eligibility under 35 USC 101? | |
| 20-158 | SRAM, LLC v. FOX Factory, Inc. | Federal Circuit | 2020-08-13 | Denied | Response Waived | 35-usc-103 commercial-success federal-circuit graham-v-john-deere nonobviousness objective-indicia patent-act patent-claim patent-law person-of-ordinary-skill secondary-considerations statutory-interpretation | Whether the Federal Circuit erred in holding that, under 35 U.S.C. § 103, before a nexus can be presumed between objective indicia of nonobviousness a… |
| 20-88 | HZNP Finance Limited, et al. v. Actavis Laboratories UT, Inc. | Federal Circuit | 2020-07-29 | Denied | Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) | 35-usc-112 claim-construction consisting-essentially-of nautilus-v-biosig patent patent-act patent-claim patent-validity reasonable-certainty statutory-interpretation transitional-phrase | Whether the 'basic and novel properties' identified in connection with a patent claim's transitional phrase 'consisting essentially of' must independe… |
| 19-1061 | Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Ltd., et al. v. Eli Lilly and Company | Federal Circuit | 2020-02-26 | Denied | Amici (2) | claim-amendment doctrine-of-equivalents festo-corp-v-shoketsu festo-corp-v-shoketsu-kinzoku-kogyo-kabushiki-co patent-claim patent-infringement patent-law patent-law-doctrine-of-equivalents patent-prosecution prosecution-history-estoppel tangential-exception | Whether patent owners may recapture subject matter they could have claimed in prosecution but did not, by arguing that they surrendered more than they… |
| 19-445 | Neology, Inc. v. International Trade Commission, et al. | Federal Circuit | 2019-10-03 | Denied | Response Waived | clear-and-convincing-evidence due-process federal-circuit filing-date notice patent patent-claim patent-validity procedural-due-process validity written-description | Whether a patent can be invalidated without notifying the patent owner about the specific invalidity challenge and giving the patent owner an opportun… |