No. 22-822

Avery Dennison Corporation v. ADASA Inc.

Lower Court: Federal Circuit
Docketed: 2023-03-01
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Amici (2)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) Experienced Counsel
Tags: 35-usc-101 binary-encoding most-significant-bits patent-claim patent-eligibility rfid rfid-technology section-101 serial-number
Key Terms:
Antitrust DueProcess Patent Trademark JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2023-05-25 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the patent claim, by subdividing a serial number into 'most significant bits' that are assigned such that they remain identical across RFID tags, constitutes patent-eligible subject matter under 35 U.S.C. § 101

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Radio Frequency Identification Device (RFID) tags are encoded with lengthy serial numbers that uniquely identify particular items. The patent at issue in this case designates the leading bits in a binary serial number as “the most significant bits,” and directs that all serial numbers in an allocated block begin with the same “most significant bits.” The question presented is whether that claim, by subdividing a serial number into “most significant bits” that are assigned such that they remain identical across RFID tags, constitutes patent-eligible subject matter under 35 U.S.C. § 101.

Docket Entries

2023-05-30
Petition DENIED.
2023-05-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/25/2023.
2023-05-08
2023-05-02
2023-04-28
Waiver of the 14-day waiting period for the distribution of the petition pursuant to Rule 15.5 filed by petitioner.
2023-04-13
Motion to extend the time to file a response is denied.
2023-04-13
2023-04-12
2023-04-07
Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 2, 2023 to May 26, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-04-07
Response to motion extend the time to file a response filed.
2023-03-21
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including May 2, 2023.
2023-03-20
Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 13, 2023 to May 2, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-03-14
Response Requested. (Due April 13, 2023)
2023-03-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/24/2023.
2023-03-03
Waiver of right of respondent ADASA, Inc. to respond filed.
2023-02-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 31, 2023)

Attorneys

ADASA, Inc.
Robert P. GreenspoonDunlap Bennett & Ludwig, PLLC, Respondent
Robert P. GreenspoonDunlap Bennett & Ludwig, PLLC, Respondent
Avery Dennison Corporation
Derek L. ShafferQuinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, Petitioner
Derek L. ShafferQuinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, Petitioner
Impinj, Inc.
Jonathan Yates EllisMcGuireWoods LLP, Amicus
Jonathan Yates EllisMcGuireWoods LLP, Amicus
National Retail Federation; Alliance for Automotive Innovation
Joseph Davod MatalHaynes and Boone, LLP, Amicus
Joseph Davod MatalHaynes and Boone, LLP, Amicus