| 23-1118 |
Ikorongo Texas LLC, et al. v. Bumble Trading LLC |
Federal Circuit |
2024-04-15 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
35-usc-251 claim-interpretation claim-limitation federal-circuit original-patent original-patent-requirement patent patent-reissue reissue statutory-construction u.s.-industrial-chemicals-inc-v-carbide-carbon-che |
Should Antares Pharma, Inc. v. Medac Pharma Inc., 771 F.3d 1354 (Fed. Cir. 2014) be overruled |
| 23-5335 |
Young Bok Song v. Tony Parker, et al. |
Sixth Circuit |
2023-08-10 |
Dismissed |
IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights claim-interpretation constitutional-rights court-of-appeals district-court due-process section-1983 standing tax-fraud |
Whether the TN U.S. District Court and U.S. Court of Appeals are incorrect in reading Scholl v. Mnuchi |
| 22-930 |
ESET, LLC, et al. v. Finjan LLC |
Federal Circuit |
2023-03-24 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
claim-interpretation claim-term-definition conflicting-definitions definiteness federal-circuit-precedent incorporation-by-reference inventor-lexicography patent-claim-construction patent-definiteness patentee-lexicography teva-v-sandoz |
Whether a patentee's express definition of a claim term governs over the Federal Circuit's new definition |
| 21-413 |
Infinity Computer Products, Inc. v. Oki Data Americas, Inc. |
Federal Circuit |
2021-09-15 |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
35-usc-112 claim-construction claim-interpretation definiteness-standard expert-testimony indefiniteness patent patent-law patent-specification person-skilled-in-the-art prosecution-history |
Whether a patent claim is indefinite under § 112, ¶ 2, if conflicting positions about a claim term arise during the patent prosecution process, even i… |
| 20-1760 |
iLife Technologies, Inc. v. Nintendo of America, Inc. |
Federal Circuit |
2021-06-17 |
Denied |
|
35-usc-101 claim-interpretation judicial-framework legal-standard patent patent-claim patent-eligibility question-of-fact question-of-law section-101 standard |
What is the appropriate standard for determining patent-eligibility under 35 USC 101? |
| 20-863 |
Akeva L.L.C. v. Nike, Inc., et al. |
Federal Circuit |
2020-12-30 |
Denied |
Amici (1)Response WaivedRelisted (2) |
35-usc-112 claim-construction claim-interpretation federal-circuit-split innovation-goals judicial-precedent patent-claim-construction patent-law patent-property-rights predictability property-rights public-notice |
Whether the Federal Circuit's 'heavy presumption' line of cases or its 'holistic' line should govern claim construction |
| 19-571 |
Intel Corporation, et al. v. Continental Circuits LLC |
Federal Circuit |
2019-10-31 |
Denied |
Amici (3)Response Waived |
claim-construction claim-interpretation claim-scope disclaimer disclaimer-doctrine federal-circuit ordinary-meaning patent patent-construction specification specification-analysis written-description |
Whether courts should construe a patent's claims in light of the written description of the invention disclosed in the patent's specification |