Whether the TN U.S. District Court and U.S. Court of Appeals are incorrect in reading Scholl v. Mnuchi

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED | (1) WHETHER THE TN U.S. DISTRICT COURT AND U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ARE INCORRECT IN READING SCHOLL V. MNUCHI, # 20-CV-05309 (N.D. CAL. SEP. 24, 2020), 489 F. SUPP.3D 1008 | (SCHOLL-1); SCHOLL-2 (ON 10/02/2020, SLIP COPY); SCHOLL-3 (ON 10/7/2020, SLIP COPY), SCHOLL-4 (ON 10/14/2020, 494 F.SUPP.3D 661), AND SCHOLL-5: (ON 11/11/2021, SLIP COPY) IN ITS CONTEXT AS MENTIONED CLAIM "A" AND "F"? . (2) WHETHER THE PLAINTIFF SONG STATED COLORABLE AND COGNIZABLE CLAIM UNDER SECTION 1983 BY ALLEGING THE TDOC/CORE CIVIC OFFICIALS' TAX-FRAUD SOLICITATION CLAIM | AS MENTIONED CLAIM "A" AND "F"? (3) WHETHER THE PLAINTIFF SONG'S REMAINING CLAIMS ARE COLORABLE AND COGNIZABLE UNDER THE SECTION 1983 AS MENTIONED CLAIM "B" THROUGH "G"? (4) WHETHER THE PLAINTIFF SONG'S CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS WERE VIOLATED BY THE DEFENDANTS' ACTION AND INACTION, BY THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT'S ERROR IN DENYING HIS CLAIM BASED ON THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT'S MISLEADING OF SCHOLL CASES, AND BY THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS’ ERROR IN DENYING APPEAL AS MENTIONED CLAIM | "A" THROUGH "G"? |