No. 20-900
Shell Oil Products Co., L.L.C., et al. v. Rhode Island
Tags: appellate-jurisdiction appellate-review circuit-split civil-procedure civil-rights-removal federal-officer-removal jurisdictional-review removal-statute statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw
AdministrativeLaw
Latest Conference:
2021-05-20
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d) authorizes appellate review of any issue encompassed in a remand order
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d) authorizes appellate review of any issue encompassed in a remand order when removal was premised in part on the federal-officer removal statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1442, or the civilrights removal statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1443.
Docket Entries
2021-06-25
JUDGMENT ISSUED.
2021-05-24
Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Energy Policy Advocates GRANTED. Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.
2021-05-24
Petition GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of <i>BP p.l.c.</i> v. <i>Mayor and City Council of Baltimore</i>, 593 U. S. ___ (2021). Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2021-05-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/20/2021.
2021-04-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/13/2021.
2021-04-05
Brief of respondent State of Rhode Island in opposition filed.
2021-02-04
Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Energy Policy Advocates.
2021-02-01
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 5, 2021.
2021-01-29
Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 4, 2021 to April 5, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-12-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 4, 2021)
Attorneys
Shell Oil Products Co., L.L.C., et al.
Theodore J. Boutrous Jr. — Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Petitioner
Theodore J. Boutrous Jr. — Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Petitioner
State of Rhode Island
Victor M. Sher — Sher Edling LLP, Respondent
Victor M. Sher — Sher Edling LLP, Respondent