civil-rights-removal
14 cases — ← All topics
| Case | Title | Lower Court | Docketed | Status | Flags | Tags | Question Presented |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25-707 | Marissa Girard v. Kenton Girard, et al. | Seventh Circuit | 2025-12-18 | Pending | Response Waived | appellate-review civil-rights-removal constitutional-violation federal-forum state-court-proceeding statutory-interpretation | Whether a defendant may remove a state court proceeding to federal court under 28 U.S.C. § 1443(1) when the state action itself violates constitutiona… |
| 25A237 | Marissa Girard v. Kenton Girard, et al. | Seventh Circuit | 2025-08-28 | Presumed Complete | civil-rights-removal federal-jurisdiction pro-se-removal racial-discrimination remand-review section-1443 | Whether a pro se litigant's notice of removal can satisfy 28 U.S.C. § 1443(1) requirements without explicitly citing the statute when federal civil ri… | |
| 24-5839 | Jordan Powell v. JBG Smith Properties, LP First Residences, et al. | District of Columbia | 2024-10-29 | Denied | Relisted (2)IFP | civil-rights-removal fourteenth-amendment remand-review statutory-interpretation subject-matter-jurisdiction thirteenth-amendment | Whether the civil rights removal statute 28 U.S.C. Section 1443 permits removal remand review according to the text thereof where Subsection 1447(d) d… |
| 23-355 | Donnie T. A. M. Kern v. Board of Supervisors of Alleghany County | Fourth Circuit | 2023-10-03 | Denied | Relisted (2) | appellate-jurisdiction civil-procedure civil-rights civil-rights-act civil-rights-act-of-1964 civil-rights-removal district-court-remand due-process removal section-1443 section-1447d standing | Whether the Fourth Circuit has appellate jurisdiction when a District Court remands a case that was removed pursuant 28 U.S.C. §1443, whereas the Peti… |
| 21-8161 | Onofre Tommy Serrano v. United States | Ninth Circuit | 2022-06-16 | Denied | Response WaivedIFP | 42-usc-1443 civil-rights civil-rights-removal criminal-prosecution due-process equal-protection federal-defense federal-jurisdiction federal-removal jurisdiction removal statutory-interpretation | Does besa domed equal cunt 2) airts oO» the basis of gelato { colae pursuant t> UL USC ¢ 20004{4) quelily foe Removel pubs tnt to 12 USC & \\443 0? |
| 21-1537 | Donnie T. Kern v. Board of Supervisors of Alleghany County | Fourth Circuit | 2022-06-08 | Denied | Response WaivedRelisted (2) | 28-usc-1447 appellate-review civil-rights civil-rights-removal federal-officer-statute jurisdictional-review pari-materia removal removal-statute statutory-interpretation | Whether reliance on a holding by the Court in Things Remembered, Inc. v. Petrarca would prohibit an appellate court to consider all of the defendant's… |
| 20-1144 | Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. v. Curtis Ulleseit, et al. | Ninth Circuit | 2021-02-22 | GVR | Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) | appellate-jurisdiction civil-procedure civil-rights-removal court-of-appeals federal-officer-removal remand remand-order removal statutory-interpretation | Whether 28 U.S.C. 1447(d) permits a court of appeals to review any issue encompassed in a district court's order remanding a removed case to state cou… |
| 20-925 | Sebhat Afework v. Velanta Monique Babbitt, et al. | Ninth Circuit | 2021-01-11 | Denied | 28-usc-1442 28-usc-1447(d) 28-usc-1448 appellate-review civil-rights-removal district-court-order federal-officer-removal remand-jurisdiction removal-statute | Whether 28 U.S.C. 1447(d) permits a court of appeals to review any issue encompassed in a district court's order remanding a removed case to state cou… | |
| 20-900 | Shell Oil Products Co., L.L.C., et al. v. Rhode Island | First Circuit | 2021-01-05 | GVR | Amici (2)Relisted (2) | appellate-jurisdiction appellate-review circuit-split civil-procedure civil-rights-removal federal-officer-removal jurisdictional-review removal-statute statutory-interpretation | Whether 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d) authorizes appellate review of any issue encompassed in a remand order |
| 20-884 | Chevron Corporation, et al. v. San Mateo County, California, et al. | Ninth Circuit | 2021-01-04 | GVR | Relisted (2) | 28-usc-1442 28-usc-1447d appellate-review civil-rights-removal federal-officer-removal jurisdictional-issue remand-order statutory-interpretation | Whether 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d) authorizes appellate review of any issue encompassed in a remand order when removal was premised in part on the federal-of… |
| 20-783 | Suncor Energy (U.S.A.) Inc., et al. v. Board of County Commissioners of Boulder County, et al. | Tenth Circuit | 2020-12-08 | GVR | Relisted (2) | appellate-review civil-rights-removal court-of-appeals federal-officer-removal jurisdiction remand-order removal statutory-interpretation | Whether 28 U.S.C. 1447(d) permits a court of appeals to review any issue encompassed in a district court's order remanding a removed case to state cou… |
| 19-1189 | BP p.l.c., et al. v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore | Fourth Circuit | 2020-03-31 | Judgment Issued | Amici (20) | appellate-review civil-rights-removal federal-officer-removal jurisdiction jurisdictional-limits remand remand-order removal statutory-interpretation | Whether 28 U.S.C. 1447(d) permits a court of appeals to review any issue encompassed in a district court's order remanding a removed case to state cou… |
| 18-1330 | Gavin B. Davis v. Timothy G. O'Connor | Ninth Circuit | 2019-04-22 | Denied | Response Waived | brady-disclosure brady-disclosures civil-rights civil-rights-removal due-process interlocutory-appeal parallel-claims removal removal-action state-criminal-proceeding | Whether a state-to-federal removal action under 28 U.S.C. § 1443 qualifies for interlocutory appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a) or 1292(b) |
| 18-1051 | James Dickey v. City of Boston Inspectional Services Department | First Circuit | 2019-02-11 | Denied | Response Waived | 28-usc-1443 42-usc-3617 appellate-review civil-procedure civil-rights civil-rights-removal civil-rights-removal-act court-of-appeals federal-jurisdiction remand remand-standard removal statutory-interpretation | Whether the Court of Appeals for the First Circuit erred when it concluded that removal was inappropriate under the Civil Rights Removal Act, 28 U.S.C… |