| 22-1224 |
Randy Ralston, et al. v. San Mateo County, California, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2023-06-21 |
Denied |
civil-rights coastal-development due-process government-action land-use-regulation pleading-standards property-rights ripeness ripeness-doctrine takings takings-claim |
Is a takings claim ripe when the government establishes a mandatory process requiring property owners to ask whether any development on their land is … |
| 22A865 |
Randy Ralston, et al. v. San Mateo County, California, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2023-04-03 |
Presumed Complete |
None |
|
| 22-495 |
Chevron Corporation, et al. v. San Mateo County, California, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2022-11-28 |
Denied |
civil-procedure climate-change climate-injury federal-jurisdiction greenhouse-gas-emissions preemption standing state-law-claims statutory-interpretation transboundary-impact |
Whether a federal district court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 over nominally state-law claims |
| 22A196 |
Chevron Corporation, et al. v. San Mateo County, California, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2022-08-31 |
Presumed Complete |
None |
|
| 20-884 |
Chevron Corporation, et al. v. San Mateo County, California, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
2021-01-04 |
GVR |
28-usc-1442 28-usc-1447d appellate-review civil-rights-removal federal-officer-removal jurisdictional-issue remand-order statutory-interpretation |
Whether 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d) authorizes appellate review of any issue encompassed in a remand order when removal was premised in part on the federal-of… |
| 19A1051 |
San Mateo County, California, et al. v. Peabody Energy Corporation |
Eighth Circuit |
2020-06-12 |
Presumed Complete |
None |
|