28-usc-1443
5 cases — ← All topics
| Case | Title | Lower Court | Docketed | Status | Flags | Tags | Question Presented |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25-5502 | Aisha Asha Bradley v. City of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania | Third Circuit | 2025-08-29 | Denied | IFP | 28-usc-1443 federal-appellate-court jurisdiction-determination removal-procedure statutory-directive third-circuit | Did the Federal Appellate Court for the Third Circuit ignore statutory directive 1443(1) by not performing a jurisdiction determination under 28 U.S.C… |
| 24A107 | Jordan Powell v. JBG Smith Properties, et al. | District of Columbia | 2024-07-30 | Presumed Complete | 28-usc-1443 civil-rights remand removal statutory-interpretation subject-matter-jurisdiction | Whether federal courts have subject matter jurisdiction to review a remand order under 28 U.S.C. §1443 involving a civil rights removal proceeding | |
| 23-5883 | Shardaye Jeacole Malik Bey v. Ohio | Sixth Circuit | 2023-10-25 | Denied | Relisted (2)IFP | 28-usc-1443 appellate-procedure civil-rights constitutional-challenge constitutional-rights court-fees criminal-procedure criminal-removal due-process filing-fees in-forma-pauperis | Whether filing fees are required for removal of a criminal action under 28 U.S.C. § 1443 |
| 22-962 | Usha Jain, et vir v. David Barker, et al. | Eleventh Circuit | 2023-04-04 | Denied | 28-usc-1443 anti-injunction-statute appellate-jurisdiction civil-procedure federal-jurisdiction federal-removal finality jurisdictional-challenge remand removal statutory-interpretation | Whether the Court of Appeals has jurisdiction to review when finality is not reached in the District case as there is no formal written remand order i… | |
| 18-1051 | James Dickey v. City of Boston Inspectional Services Department | First Circuit | 2019-02-11 | Denied | Response Waived | 28-usc-1443 42-usc-3617 appellate-review civil-procedure civil-rights civil-rights-removal civil-rights-removal-act court-of-appeals federal-jurisdiction remand remand-standard removal statutory-interpretation | Whether the Court of Appeals for the First Circuit erred when it concluded that removal was inappropriate under the Civil Rights Removal Act, 28 U.S.C… |