No. 18-1051
James Dickey v. City of Boston Inspectional Services Department
Response Waived
Tags: 28-usc-1443 42-usc-3617 appellate-review civil-procedure civil-rights civil-rights-removal civil-rights-removal-act court-of-appeals federal-jurisdiction remand remand-standard removal statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2019-03-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Court of Appeals for the First Circuit erred when it concluded that removal was inappropriate under the Civil Rights Removal Act, 28 U.S.C. §1443 and 42 U.S.C. §3617; and whether a detailed analysis was required before the case was remanded to the state court
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the Court of Appeals for the First Circuit erred when it concluded that removal was inappropriate under the Civil Rights Removal Act, 28 U.S.C. §1443 and 42 U.S.C. §3617; and whether a detailed analysis was required before the case was remanded to the state court.
Docket Entries
2019-04-01
Petition DENIED.
2019-03-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/29/2019.
2019-02-25
Waiver of right of respondent City of Boston Insepctional Services Department to respond filed.
2019-02-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 13, 2019)
Attorneys
City of Boston Insepctional Services Department
Robert Arcangeli — City of Boston Law Department, Respondent
James Dickey
James Dickey — Petitioner