Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether 28 U.S.C. 1447(d) permits a court of appeals to review any issue encompassed in a district court's order remanding a removed case to state court where the removal to federal court was premised in part on the federal officer removal statute, 28 U.S.C. 1442, or the civil rights removal statute, 28 U.S.C. 1448
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED The question presented is the same as that presented in BP p.lc. v. Mayor & City Council of Baltimore, No. 19-1189 (to be argued Jan. 19, 2021): Whether 28 U.S.C. 1447(d) permits a court of appeals to review any issue encompassed in a district court’s order remanding a removed case to state court where the removal to federal court was premised in part on the federal officer removal statute, 28 U.S.C. 1442, or the civil rights removal statute, 28 U.S.C. 1448.
2021-05-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/10/2021.
2021-05-20
Supplemental brief of petitioner Sebhat Afework filed.
2021-05-10
Response to petition from respondent United States filed.
2021-04-06
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including May 10, 2021.
2021-04-05
Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 12, 2021 to May 10, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-03-15
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including April 12, 2021, for all respondents.
2021-03-12
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 12, 2021 to April 12, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-02-12
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 12, 2021, for all respondents.
2021-02-10
Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 10, 2021 to March 12, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-01-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 10, 2021)