Whether the election of remedies and New York City impact doctrines barred Plaintiff's NYSHRL and NYCHRL claims

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1) Whether the Courts below erred in holding the election of remedies and New York City impact doctrines barred Plaintiff's NYSHRL and NYCHRL claims, respectively. 2) Whether the Courts below erred in holding the incidents predating January 4, 2018, were time-barredwith respect to Plaintiff’s discrimination and retaliation claims. 3) Whether the Courts below erred in holding Plaintiff failed to allege a plausible claim for discrimination. 4) Whether the Courts below erred in holding Plaintiff failed to allege a plausible claim for hostile work environment. 5) Whether the Courts below erred in holding Plaintiff failed to allege a plausible claim for retaliation. i PARTIES TO THE CASE AND