No. 21-1161
Steven Aiello and Joseph Gerardi v. United States
Tags: 18-usc-1341 18-usc-1343 18-usc-1346 deception economic-information government-advocacy government-agency honest-services-fraud mail-fraud money-or-property-fraud statutory-interpretation wire-fraud
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw ERISA FirstAmendment DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
AdministrativeLaw ERISA FirstAmendment DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2023-05-18
(distributed 3 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether paying an influential private citizen to advocate one's position before a government agency can constitute honest services fraud under 18 U.S.C. §1346
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether paying an influential private citizen to advocate one’s position before a government agency can constitute honest services fraud under 18 U.S.C. §1346. 2. Whether deception that deprives a person of “potentially valuable economic information,” without more, can constitute “money or property” fraud under the federal mail and wire fraud statutes, 18 U.S.C. §1341 and §1343.
Docket Entries
2023-06-23
Judgment issued.
2023-05-22
Petition GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of <i>Percoco</i> v. <i>United States</i>, 598 U. S. ___ (2023) and <i>Ciminelli</i> v. <i>United States</i>, 598 U. S. ___ (2023).
2023-05-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/18/2023.
2022-06-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/29/2022.
2022-06-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/23/2022.
2022-06-03
Reply of petitioners Steven Aiello and Joseph Gerardi filed. (Distributed)
2022-04-07
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including May 24, 2022.
2022-04-05
Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 25, 2022 to May 24, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-03-25
Brief amici curiae of Criminal Law Scholars filed.
2022-03-21
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 25, 2022.
2022-03-17
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 25, 2022 to April 25, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-02-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 25, 2022)
2022-01-07
Application (21A298) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until March 1, 2022.
Attorneys
Criminal Law Scholars
Michael Dallas Lieberman — Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Amicus
Michael Dallas Lieberman — Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Amicus
New York Council of Defense Lawyers
Steven Aiello and Joseph Gerardi
Alexandra Anastasia Ekaterina Shapiro — Shapiro Arato Bach LLP, Petitioner
Alexandra Anastasia Ekaterina Shapiro — Shapiro Arato Bach LLP, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent