Whether the refusal or denial of the MEMORANDUM and ORDER to interpret the issues of questions of laws violated laws

No question identified. : SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES QUESTION | ; A) DID the refusal or denial of the MEMORANDUM of Feb. 23, 2021 and the ORDER of May 26, 2021 to interpret the issues of questions of laws, ISSUES |, Il, IN, Vand V in the p.2-5 MOTION FOR RELIEF of October 22, 2019, February 8, 2020 and the p.2-5 PETITION FOR REHEARING of March 5, 2021, regarding retirement benefits with the California Public Employees’ Retirement System, PERS, "departed from accepted and usual course of judicial proceedings” U.S. Supreme Court Rule 10, in violation of laws? a) 5 U.S. Code § 706.Scope of review | To the extent necessary to decision and when presented, the reviewing court shall decide all relevant questions of law, interpret constitutional | and statutory provisions, . . (Emphasis added.) | b) Fifth Amendment : No person shall be. . deprived of life, liberty or property, without due process of law c) Code of Conduct for U,S. Judges | Canon 2 (A) Respect for Law. A judge should respect and comply with the | law.. | Date: July Z2¢, 2021 Respectfully submitted: Lucio A. Barroga 4 | PARTIES OF PROCEEDING LUCIO A. BARROGA, Plaintiff-Appellant | P.O. Box 2516 Long Beach, CA 90801 | | Tel 562-560-7863 | Board of Administration, Defendant-Appeliee California Public Employees’ Retirement System, PERS | RICHARD H. KOPPES, Deputy Executive Officer and General Counsel Defendant's Attorneys ROB BONTA, Attorney General of California CHERYL L. FEINER, Senior Assistant Attorney General GREGORY D. BROWN, Supervising Deputy Attorney General DARRELL W. SPENCE | BRENDA A. RAY, Deputy Attorney General . 1300 | St. Suite 125 ; P.O. Box 944255 Sacramento, CA 94244-2550 Tel 916 — 210 7806