| 20-1199 |
Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President and Fellows of Harvard College |
First Circuit |
Judgment Issued |
CVSGAmici (32)Relisted (4) |
affirmative-action asian-american-discrimination civil-rights equal-protection higher-education race-based-admissions strict-scrutiny title-vi |
1. Should this Court overrule Grutter v. Bollinger,
539 U.S. 306 (2003), and hold that institutions of
higher education cannot use race as a factor in… |
64.0 |
| 21-454 |
Michael Sackett, et ux. v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
Judgment Issued |
Amici (49)Relisted (3) |
civil-rights clean-water-act due-process epa-authority navigable-waters rapanos-test rapanos-v-united-states significant-nexus wetlands-jurisdiction |
Petitioners Michael and Chantell Sackett own a vacant lot in a mostly built-out residential subdivision near Priest Lake, Idaho. The lot has no surfac… |
60.5 |
| 21-429 |
Oklahoma v. Victor Manuel Castro-Huerta |
Oklahoma |
Judgment Issued |
Amici (22)Relisted (3) |
civil-rights criminal-jurisdiction criminal-law due-process indian-country indian-law jurisdiction mcgirt-precedent mcgirt-v-oklahoma non-indian-crimes state-prosecution tribal-jurisdiction |
1. Whether a State has authority to prosecute non-Indians who commit crimes against Indians in Indian country.
2. Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S. … |
33.5 |
| 21-86 |
Axon Enterprise, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
Judgment Issued |
Amici (15)Relisted (9) |
administrative-law constitutional-challenge constitutional-law federal-courts federal-trade-commission judicial-review jurisdiction removal-protections separation-of-powers |
After petitioner acquired an essentially insolvent competitor, it found itself subjected to the review of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), rather t… |
29.5 |
| 21-707 |
Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. University of North Carolina, et al. |
Fourth Circuit |
Judgment Issued |
Amici (14)Relisted (3) |
admissions affirmative-action civil-rights diversity educational-diversity equal-protection grutter-precedent higher-education higher-education-admissions race-conscious-admissions race-neutral-alternatives |
1. Should this Court overrule Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306 (2003), and hold that institutions of higher education cannot use race as a factor in… |
25.5 |
| 21-251 |
Oklahoma v. William Clayton Brown |
Oklahoma |
Denied |
Amici (1)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (4) |
court-precedent criminal-appeal criminal-jurisdiction federal-indian-law indian-law judicial-review mcgirt-precedent oklahoma-jurisdiction stare-decisis statutory-interpretation tribal-sovereignty |
Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S. Ct. 2452 (2020), should be overruled. |
16.0 |
| 21-258 |
Oklahoma v. Donta Keith Davis |
Oklahoma |
Denied |
Amici (1)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (4) |
criminal-procedure due-process federalism mcgirt-precedent native-american-law native-american-rights oklahoma-criminal-law stare-decisis statutory-interpretation supreme-court-review tribal-jurisdiction |
Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S. Ct. 2452 (2020), should be overruled. |
16.0 |
| 21-443 |
William Beaumont Hospital v. United States, ex rel. David Felten |
Sixth Circuit |
Denied |
Amici (1)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) |
civil-procedure employee employment-status false-claims-act qui-tam retaliation standing statutory-interpretation whistleblower-protection |
31 U.S.C. § 3730(h)(1) protects an "employee" against retaliation for trying to stop a violation of the False Claims Act. The question presented is wh… |
15.0 |
| 21-484 |
Oklahoma v. Sonny Raye McCombs |
Oklahoma |
Denied |
Amici (2)Relisted (3) |
civil-rights criminal-procedure due-process federal-indian-law jurisdictional-challenge McGirt-precedent native-american-law oklahoma-sovereignty standing statutory-interpretation tribal-jurisdiction |
Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S.Ct. 2452 (2020), should be overruled. |
13.5 |
| 21-395 |
Kevin Owen McCarthy, et al. v. Nancy Pelosi, in Her Official Capacity as Speaker of the House, et al. |
District of Columbia |
Denied |
Amici (1)Relisted (4) |
congressional-powers constitutional-law constitutional-review judicial-review legislative-procedure legislative-process pandemic-governance proxy-voting separation-of-powers speech-and-debate-clause speech-or-debate-clause |
In May 2020, the U.S. House of Representatives passed a resolution to allow Members to cast floor votes by proxy. The unprecedented resolution permits… |
13.0 |
| 21-252 |
Oklahoma v. Shannon James Kepler |
Oklahoma |
Denied |
Amici (1)Relisted (3) |
court-of-criminal-appeals criminal-case criminal-law federal-indian-law legal-precedent mcgirt-precedent native-american-law oklahoma-jurisdiction stare-decisis statutory-interpretation tribal-sovereignty |
Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S. Ct. 2452
(2020), should be overruled. |
12.5 |
| 21-253 |
Oklahoma v. Christopher Jason Hathcoat |
Oklahoma |
Denied |
Amici (1)Relisted (3) |
criminal-procedure federal-indian-law judicial-review jurisdiction McGirt-precedent native-american-law native-american-rights oklahoma-sovereignty statutory-interpretation tribal-jurisdiction tribal-sovereignty |
Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S. Ct. 2452 (2020), should be overruled. |
12.5 |
| 21-254 |
Oklahoma v. Jordan Batice Mitchell |
Oklahoma |
Denied |
Amici (1)Relisted (3) |
criminal-procedure federalism judicial-review McGirt-precedent native-american-law native-american-rights oklahoma-sovereignty stare-decisis statutory-interpretation tribal-jurisdiction tribal-sovereignty |
Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S. Ct. 2452 (2020), should be overruled. |
12.5 |
| 21-255 |
Oklahoma v. Grant N. Jackson, IV |
Oklahoma |
Denied |
Amici (1)Relisted (3) |
criminal-jurisdiction criminal-procedure federal-indian-law federalism McGirt-precedent native-american-rights oklahoma-sovereignty stare-decisis statutory-interpretation tribal-jurisdiction |
Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S. Ct. 2452 (2020), should be overruled. |
12.5 |
| 21-257 |
Oklahoma v. Jimmie Dewayne Starr |
Oklahoma |
Denied |
Amici (1)Relisted (3) |
140 S. Ct. 2452 (2020) should be overruled criminal-appellate-procedure criminal-procedure federal-indian-law jurisdictional-challenge mcgirt-precedent native-american-law native-american-rights oklahoma-criminal-law oklahoma-sovereignty stare-decisis statutory-interpretation supreme-court-review tribal-jurisdiction tribal-sovereignty |
Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S. Ct. 2452 (2020), should be overruled. |
12.5 |
| 21-259 |
Oklahoma v. Arnold Dean Howell |
Oklahoma |
Denied |
Amici (1)Relisted (3) |
criminal-law criminal-procedure federal-jurisdiction indian-law judicial-review McGirt-precedent native-american-rights oklahoma-sovereignty stare-decisis state-jurisdiction statutory-interpretation tribal-jurisdiction |
Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S. Ct. 2452
(2020), should be overruled. |
12.5 |
| 21-319 |
Oklahoma v. Nacole Ryan Bain |
Oklahoma |
Denied |
Amici (1)Relisted (3) |
criminal-law criminal-procedure federal-jurisdiction jurisdictional-challenge mcgirt-precedent native-american-law oklahoma-law stare-decisis state-sovereignty statutory-interpretation supreme-court-review tribal-jurisdiction |
Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S. Ct. 2452 (2020), should be overruled. |
12.5 |
| 21-320 |
Oklahoma v. Robert William Perry, II |
Oklahoma |
Denied |
Amici (1)Relisted (3) |
criminal-appellate-review criminal-procedure federal-indian-law jurisdictional-challenge mcgirt-precedent native-american-law native-american-sovereignty oklahoma-criminal-law overruling-precedent stare-decisis statutory-interpretation tribal-jurisdiction |
Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S. Ct. 2452 (2020), should be overruled. |
12.5 |
| 21-321 |
Oklahoma v. Ryan Cortlan Johnson |
Oklahoma |
Denied |
Amici (1)Relisted (3) |
140 S. Ct. 2452 (2020) should be overruled criminal-appellate-review criminal-law federal-indian-law jurisdictional-challenge mcgirt-precedent native-american-law native-american-sovereignty oklahoma-criminal-law overruling-precedent stare-decisis statutory-interpretation tribal-jurisdiction |
Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S. Ct. 2452 (2020), should be overruled. |
12.5 |
| 21-322 |
Oklahoma v. Joseph Harjo |
Oklahoma |
Denied |
Amici (1)Relisted (3) |
criminal-appellate-review criminal-law federal-jurisdiction jurisdictional-challenge mcgirt-precedent native-american-law native-american-rights oklahoma-criminal-law stare-decisis state-sovereignty statutory-interpretation tribal-jurisdiction |
Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S. Ct. 2452 (2020), should be overruled. |
12.5 |
| 21-323 |
Oklahoma v. Michael Eugene Spears |
Oklahoma |
Denied |
Amici (1)Relisted (3) |
140 S. Ct. 2452 (2020) should be overruled criminal-appellate-review criminal-procedure federal-indian-law jurisdictional-challenge mcgirt-precedent native-american-law native-american-rights native-american-sovereignty oklahoma-criminal-law oklahoma-sovereignty stare-decisis statutory-interpretation tribal-jurisdiction tribal-sovereignty |
Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S. Ct. 2452 (2020), should be overruled. |
12.5 |
| 21-325 |
Oklahoma v. Matthew Steven Janson |
Oklahoma |
Denied |
Amici (1)Relisted (3) |
criminal-appellate-procedure criminal-law due-process federalism mcgirt-precedent native-american-law oklahoma-criminal-law stare-decisis statutory-interpretation supreme-court-review tribal-jurisdiction |
Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S. Ct. 2452 (2020), should be overruled. |
12.5 |
| 21-326 |
Oklahoma v. Devin Warren Sizemore |
Oklahoma |
Denied |
Amici (1)Relisted (3) |
criminal-law criminal-procedure federal-indian-law jurisdictional-challenge McGirt-precedent native-american-law native-american-rights oklahoma-sovereignty stare-decisis statutory-interpretation tribal-jurisdiction tribal-sovereignty |
Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S. Ct. 2452 (2020), should be overruled. |
12.5 |
| 21-327 |
Oklahoma v. Floyd Joseph Ball, Jr. |
Oklahoma |
Denied |
Amici (1)Relisted (3) |
criminal-appellate-review criminal-procedure due-process federalism jurisdictional-challenge mcgirt-precedent native-american-law native-american-sovereignty oklahoma-criminal-law stare-decisis statutory-interpretation tribal-jurisdiction |
Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S. Ct. 2452 (2020), should be overruled. |
12.5 |
| 21-369 |
Oklahoma v. Bea Ann Epperson |
Oklahoma |
Denied |
Amici (1)Relisted (3) |
criminal-appellate-review criminal-procedure federal-indian-law jurisdictional-challenge mcgirt-precedent native-american-law native-american-rights oklahoma-criminal-law overruling-precedent stare-decisis statutory-interpretation tribal-jurisdiction |
Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S. Ct. 2452 (2020), should be overruled. |
12.5 |
| 21-370 |
Oklahoma v. Travis Dray Stewart |
Oklahoma |
Denied |
Amici (1)Relisted (3) |
criminal-law criminal-procedure federal-jurisdiction indian-law judicial-review McGirt-precedent native-american-rights oklahoma-sovereignty statutory-interpretation tribal-jurisdiction tribal-sovereignty |
Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S. Ct. 2452 (2020), should be overruled. |
12.5 |
| 21-371 |
Oklahoma v. Jeffery Arch Jones |
Oklahoma |
Denied |
Amici (1)Relisted (3) |
criminal-law criminal-procedure due-process federalism judicial-review McGirt-precedent native-american-law native-american-rights oklahoma-sovereignty stare-decisis statutory-interpretation tribal-jurisdiction |
Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S. Ct. 2452 (2020), should be overruled. |
12.5 |
| 21-372 |
Oklahoma v. Charles Michael Cooper |
Oklahoma |
Denied |
Amici (1)Relisted (3) |
criminal-appellate-review criminal-law federal-jurisdiction jurisdictional-challenge mcgirt-precedent native-american-law native-american-sovereignty oklahoma-criminal-law stare-decisis state-sovereignty statutory-interpretation tribal-jurisdiction |
Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S. Ct. 2452 (2020), should be overruled. |
12.5 |
| 21-373 |
Oklahoma v. Joses Ric-E Beck |
Oklahoma |
Denied |
Amici (1)Relisted (3) |
criminal-law criminal-procedure federal-indian-law jurisdiction jurisdictional-challenge McGirt-precedent native-american-law native-american-rights oklahoma-sovereignty stare-decisis statutory-interpretation tribal-jurisdiction |
Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S. Ct. 2452 (2020), should be overruled. |
12.5 |
| 21-486 |
Oklahoma v. Dakota James Alleyn Shriver |
Oklahoma |
Denied |
Amici (1)Relisted (3) |
140 S.Ct. 2452 (2020) should be overruled appellate-review criminal-law criminal-procedure federal-jurisdiction indian-law jurisdictional-challenge mcgirt-precedent native-american-jurisdiction native-american-law native-american-rights oklahoma-law oklahoma-sovereignty precedent-review stare-decisis statutory-interpretation supreme-court-precedent tribal-jurisdiction tribal-sovereignty |
Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S.Ct. 2452 (2020), should be overruled. |
12.5 |
| 21-487 |
Oklahoma v. David Deval Martin |
Oklahoma |
Denied |
Amici (1)Relisted (3) |
criminal-jurisdiction criminal-law federal-indian-law jurisdictional-boundaries native-american-law native-american-rights oklahoma-law overruling-precedent stare-decisis statutory-interpretation supreme-court-precedent tribal-sovereignty |
Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S.Ct. 2452 (2020), should be overruled. |
12.5 |
| 21-488 |
Oklahoma v. Dakota Shay Fox |
Oklahoma |
Denied |
Amici (1)Relisted (3) |
140 S.Ct. 2452 (2020) should be overruled appellate-review criminal-jurisdiction criminal-law criminal-procedure federal-indian-law jurisdiction jurisdictional-challenge mcgirt-precedent native-american-law oklahoma-sovereignty oklahoma-statehood stare-decisis tribal-jurisdiction tribal-sovereignty |
Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S.Ct. 2452 (2020), should be overruled. |
12.5 |
| 21-502 |
Oklahoma v. Terrance Lucas Cottingham |
Oklahoma |
Denied |
Amici (1)Relisted (3) |
criminal-law criminal-procedure federal-indian-law jurisdictional-challenge mcgirt-precedent native-american-law oklahoma-sovereignty overruling-precedent stare-decisis statutory-interpretation tribal-jurisdiction |
Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S.Ct. 2452
(2020), should be overruled. |
12.5 |
| 21-608 |
Oklahoma v. Laurie Jean Martin |
Oklahoma |
Denied |
Amici (1)Relisted (3) |
appellate-review criminal-law criminal-procedure federal-jurisdiction mcgirt-precedent native-american-law oklahoma-sovereignty stare-decisis state-sovereignty statutory-interpretation tribal-jurisdiction |
Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S.Ct. 2452 (2020), should be overruled. |
12.5 |
| 21-882 |
Esteban Gaspar-Felipe v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Amici (4)Response Waived |
5th-amendment 6th-amendment acquitted-conduct criminal-sentencing due-process fifth-amendment jury-trial sixth-amendment |
1. Whether the Fifth Amendment's Due Process Clause prohibits a federal court from basing a criminal defendant's sentence on a charge of which a jury … |
12.5 |
| 21-704 |
Oklahoma v. Samantha Ann Perales |
Oklahoma |
Denied |
Amici (1)Relisted (2) |
140 S.Ct. 2452 (2020) should be overruled criminal-appellate-review criminal-law federal-indian-law jurisdictional-challenge mcgirt-precedent native-american-law native-american-rights oklahoma-criminal-law oklahoma-sovereignty overruling-precedent precedent-review stare-decisis statutory-interpretation tribal-jurisdiction |
Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S.Ct. 2452 (2020), should be overruled. |
12.0 |
| 21-324 |
Oklahoma v. Kadetrix Devon Grayson |
Oklahoma |
Denied |
Relisted (3) |
criminal-appellate-review criminal-law federal-jurisdiction indian-law jurisdictional-challenge mcgirt-precedent native-american-sovereignty oklahoma-criminal-law stare-decisis statutory-interpretation tribal-jurisdiction tribal-sovereignty |
Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S. Ct. 2452 (2020), should be overruled. |
11.5 |
| 21-644 |
Oklahoma v. Floyd Joseph Ball, Jr. |
Oklahoma |
Denied |
Amici (1) |
criminal-appellate-review criminal-law federal-indian-law jurisdictional-challenge mcgirt-precedent native-american-law native-american-rights oklahoma-state-law stare-decisis statutory-interpretation tribal-jurisdiction tribal-sovereignty |
Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma , 140 S.Ct. 2452 (2020) , should be over ruled. |
11.5 |
| 21-645 |
Oklahoma v. Chandler Kyle Ned |
Oklahoma |
Denied |
Amici (1) |
appellate-review criminal-law federal-jurisdiction indian-law jurisdictional-challenge mcgirt-precedent native-american-rights oklahoma-criminal-law stare-decisis statutory-interpretation tribal-jurisdiction |
Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S.Ct. 2452 (2020), should be overruled. |
11.5 |
| 21-646 |
Oklahoma v. Dameon Lamar Leathers |
Oklahoma |
Denied |
Amici (1) |
140 S.Ct. 2452 (2020) should be overruled court-of-criminal-appeals criminal-appellate-review criminal-procedure due-process federalism jurisdictional-challenge mcgirt-precedent native-american-law native-american-rights oklahoma-criminal-law oklahoma-jurisdiction precedent-challenge stare-decisis statutory-interpretation tribal-jurisdiction tribal-sovereignty |
Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S.Ct. 2452 (2020), should be overruled. |
11.5 |
| 21-901 |
Casondra Pollreis, on Behalf of Herself and Her Minor Children, W. Y. and S. Y. v. Lamont Marzolf |
Eighth Circuit |
Denied |
Amici (3)Response Waived |
children's-rights civil-rights constitutional-protections fourth-amendment fourth-amendment-expansion law-enforcement-conduct probable-cause search-and-seizure terry-v-ohio |
Does the Fourth Amendment permit the search and seizure without probable cause of two compliant children, handcuffed and at gunpoint, even after the c… |
11.5 |
| 20-854 |
Linda Jackie Larson, Personal Representative of the Estate of Kenneth Earl Larson v. Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Relisted (2) |
None |
|
11.0 |
| 21-538 |
Dennis Reagle, Warden v. Roderick V. Lewis |
Seventh Circuit |
Denied |
|
aedpa circuit-court federal-law habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel penson-v-ohio sentencing strickland-v-washington supreme-court united-states-v-cronic |
While Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984), requires an ineffective-assistance claimant to prove both deficient performance and prejudic… |
10.5 |
| 21-581 |
Allen H. Loughry, II v. United States |
Fourth Circuit |
Denied |
|
criminal-procedure extrajudicial-communication juror-contact juror-misconduct presumptive-prejudice remmer-hearing sixth-amendment social-media social-media-evidence trial-integrity |
In Remmer v. United States, 347 U.S. 227, 229 (1954), the Court held that "any private communication, contact, or tampering directly or indirectly, wi… |
10.5 |
| 21-837 |
Robert Bohanon, et al. v. Jacqueline Lawrence, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Amici (1)Response Waived |
appeals appellate-jurisdiction civil-procedure district-court federal-courts interlocutory-appeal jurisdiction qualified-immunity summary-judgment |
Whether, and in what circumstances, a federal court of appeals has jurisdiction over an immediate appeal from a district court's summary-judgment orde… |
9.5 |
| 21-899 |
Lauren Rosecan v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
collateral-order-doctrine criminal-information criminal-procedure due-process felony grand-jury grand-jury-clause interlocutory-appeal jurisdictional-defect pretrial-motion |
Whether the denial of a pretrial motion to dismiss
a criminal information that charges, in violation of theGrand Jury Clause, felony offenses without … |
8.5 |
| 21-126 |
Lucio A. Barroga v. Board of Administration of California Public Employees' Retirement System |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Relisted (2) |
administrative-law civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process judicial-proceedings retirement-benefits statutory-interpretation |
A) DID the refusal or denial of the MEMORANDUM of Feb. 23, 2021 and the
ORDER of May 26, 2021 to interpret the issues of questions of laws, ISSUES I, … |
6.0 |
| 21-584 |
Agendia, Inc. v. Xavier Becerra, Secretary of Health and Human Services |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
|
administrative-law administrative-procedure delegation-of-authority local-coverage-determination medicare-act medicare-administrative-contractor medicare-coverage-policy medicare-policy rulemaking-requirements statutory-interpretation |
Whether the rulemaking requirements of 42 U.S.C. § 1395hh(a)(2) apply to a Medicare policy deeming all molecular diagnostic laboratory tests "investig… |
5.5 |
| 21-606 |
Donald Shooter v. Arizona, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
|
appellate-review civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process equal-protection free-speech legislative-immunity legislative-procedure qualified-immunity standing |
1. Does this case present an important question not previously decided by the Supreme Court in which an elected member of the Arizona Legislature enga… |
5.5 |
| 21-738 |
Hotze Health Wellness Center International One, LLC, et al. v. Environmental Research Center, Inc. |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
|
attorney-fees civil-procedure discretionary-jurisdiction remand removal standing |
This Court has recently sought to define when 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c)-(d) preclude appeals from remand orders. Carlsbad Tech., Inc. v. HIF Bio, Inc., 556 … |
5.5 |
| 21-741 |
Thomas E. Parker, et al. v. Sea-Mar Community Health Center |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
|
appointment-billing dental dental-services double-billing false-claims-act fraud healthcare-billing medicaid medicaid-fraud standard-of-care |
Does a plaintiff state a claim under the False Claims Act by alleging a purposeful scheme to fraudulently double rates charged to Medicaid for pediatr… |
5.5 |
| 21-744 |
William Maner v. Dignity Health, fka Catholic Healthcare West |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
|
civil-rights employment employment-law favoritism gender-discrimination summary-judgment title-vii workplace-favoritism |
1. ) Where an employer allows workplace activities of ongoing, egregious, or multiple instances of favoritism to occur, such as job hiring, 'job reten… |
5.5 |
| 21-753 |
Trina L. Janura v. John J. Janura, Jr. |
West Virginia |
Denied |
|
14th-amendment conflict-of-interest due-process fourteenth-amendment judicial-conduct judicial-discipline judicial-ethics judicial-investigation judicial-misconduct recusal |
1. Did the non-disclosure and non-recusal from either the circuit court or the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals both violate the petitioner's ri… |
5.5 |
| 21-758 |
James P. Tatten v. LSF9 Master Participation Trust |
Colorado |
Denied |
|
14th-amendment due-process equal-protection foreclosure fourteenth-amendment nonjudicial-foreclosure nonjudicial-hearing property-rights real-property state-court-procedure |
In Obduskey v. McCarthy, this Court observed: "Colorado's 'nonjudicial' foreclosure process is something of a hybrid, though no party claims these fea… |
5.5 |
| 21-766 |
Douglass Properties II, LLC v. City of Olympia, Washington |
Washington |
Denied |
|
constitutional-scrutiny due-process government-discretion impact-fees koontz-v-st-johns land-use land-use-permit nollan-dolan-doctrine nollan-v-california-coastal-commission property-rights takings |
Whether, after Koontz, the Nollan/Dolan doctrine applies generally to impact fees, i.e., whether after Koontz there is any distinction between "adjudi… |
5.5 |
| 21-768 |
Lil’ Man in the Boat, Inc. v. City and County of San Francisco, California, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
|
42-usc-1983 commerce-clause fees-and-obligations navigable-waters rivers-and-harbors-act statutory-interpretation tonnage-clause |
Pursuant to the Rivers and Harbors Act, Congress provided that "No taxes, tolls, operating charges, fees, or any other impositions whatever shall be l… |
5.5 |
| 21-421 |
Damian R. Nastri v. Department of Homeland Security |
Federal Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2) |
administrative-law agency-governance board-quorum civil-liberties civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process separation-of-powers standing |
Can the U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board (hereafter MSPB, or Board); make decisions; solicit, hire, promote, transfer, reassign, or fire staff; sel… |
4.0 |
| 21-524 |
Schlomit Ruttkamp v. Bank of New York Mellon, fka Bank of New York |
Connecticut |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2) |
14th-amendment civil-procedure discovery due-process foreclosure judicial-sanctions mortgage-law notice property-rights sanctions |
Questions presented as follows:
Granting sanctions without the court's adequate notice of its intention to impose sanctions and the opportunity to be… |
4.0 |
| 21-5514 |
Diandra Marie Harvey v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
18-usc-3553(f) constructive-possession discretionary-review fifth-circuit firearm supervisory-powers |
Whether the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ("Fifth Circuit")–which affirmed the decision of the District Court t… |
4.0 |
| 21-777 |
Blake Edward Halfacre v. United States |
Tenth Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
administrative-law employment-rights exclusive-provisions federal-employees federal-employment-compensation-act federal-tort-claims-act light-duty-job light-duty-job-offer united-states-court-of-appeals workers-compensation |
Are the "exclusive provisions" in the FECA (Federal Employment Compensation Act) applicable, or available to Federal Employees who also have no formal… |
3.5 |
| 21-784 |
In Re Melba L. Ford |
|
Denied |
Response Waived |
attorney-misconduct conscience-based-duty court-discretion due-process equitable-relief fraud fraud-allegations judicial-duty judicial-ethics petition-review standing |
Question I.
Do Justices owe a mandatory , non-discretionary,
equitable, conscience-based moral duty to themselves,
to all Federal Bar attorneys and … |
3.5 |
| 21-790 |
Bradford Disney Lund v. David J. Cowan, Judge, Superior Court of California, Los Angeles County, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
42-usc-1983 ada civil-rights declaratory-relief judicial-immunity ninth-circuit respondeat-superior section-1983 title-ii-ada |
1. Whether this Court should grant Certiorari to review the Ninth Circuit's holdings that because of Judge Cowan's judicial immunity, the doctrine of … |
3.5 |
| 21-794 |
Pamela Reilly, Personal Representative of the Estate of Rosemarie Reilly v. Ottawa County, Michigan, et al. |
Sixth Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
14th-amendment civil-rights deshaney-test deshaney-v-winnebago domestic-violence due-process fourteenth-amendment state-actors state-created-danger substantive-due-process third-party-harm |
1. Whether an abused woman who faces increased danger from her abuser because State Actors have emboldened and condoned the abuser's violently escalat… |
3.5 |
| 21-795 |
Todd R. Sewell v. Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security |
Tenth Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
None |
|
3.5 |
| 21-808 |
Kimberley Ann Gunnarson, et al. v. Texas |
Texas |
Denied |
Response Waived |
14th-amendment billboard constitutional-law due-process eminent-domain fifth-amendment just-compensation property-code takings takings-clause |
Does Chapter 21 of the Texas Property Code violate the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution by failing to require adequate compensation t… |
3.5 |
| 21-813 |
Michael Peck v. Department of Labor, Administrative Review Board, et al. |
Fourth Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
civil-rights congressional-intent energy-reorganization-act nrc-employment nuclear-regulatory-commission sovereign-immunity statutory-interpretation whistleblower whistleblower-protection |
In 2005, Congress amended the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974 ("ERA") to expressly include the Nuclear Regulatory Commission ("NRC") as an employer … |
3.5 |
| 21-818 |
EGAE, LLC, et al. v. Department of Housing and Urban Development |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
administrative-review appellate-review civil-monetary-penalties constitutional-claims constitutional-issues due-process hud judicial-jurisdiction statutory-interpretation |
1. In 12 U.S.C. § 1735f-15( e), Congress authorized
federal Courts of Appeals to take direct review of the
Secretary of Housing and Urban Development'… |
3.5 |
| 21-823 |
Abdulla Nagi Naser Daifullah v. United States |
Eighth Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
citizenship-revocation civil-procedure congressional-power denaturalization due-process good-cause-affidavit jurisdiction jurisdictional-requirement naturalization naturalization-proceedings statutory-interpretation |
Whether 8 U.S.C. § 1451(a)'s requirement that the United States Attorney for the respective district institute proceedings is a jurisdictional require… |
3.5 |
| 21-826 |
K. John Corrigan, et al. v. Deb Haaland, Secretary of the Interior, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
administrative-law agency-deference bureau-of-land-management chevron-doctrine federal-land-policy-and-management-act grazing-preference judicial-review statutory-interpretation taylor-grazing-act |
Whether the Ninth Circuit correctly held that statutory silence on the issue before the court can be unambiguous for purposes of the Chevron doctrine … |
3.5 |
| 21-880 |
Vicki Stefanini v. Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response Waived |
appellate-rules court-procedure defects dismissal judicial-review legal-interpretation merits-review procedural-technicality rehearing substantial-compliance |
1. Whether a technical application of appellate rules should bar a review of the merits of an appellate case, when substantial compliance with the rul… |
3.5 |
| 21-928 |
Alan Hutzel v. Georgia |
Georgia |
Denied |
Response Waived |
anonymous-speech anti-mask-law conduct-of-others constitutional-rights first-amendment free-speech intent-to-intimidate rally-conduct |
1. Does finding of an intent to intimidate for the purpose of an anti-mask law conviction based solely on the conduct of others violate the First Amen… |
3.5 |
| 21-929 |
Marie Henry v. The Florida Bar, et al. |
Florida |
Denied |
Response Waived |
bar-membership civil-rights constitutional-rights court-access due-process first-amendment free-speech integrated-bar judicial-ethics keller-v-state-bar-of-california standing |
1. Whether this Court's First Amendment speech and petitioning precedents on the fundamental constitutional right to access the court as expressed in … |
3.5 |
| 21-6028 |
Johnny Jasper Williams v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
GVR |
IFP |
borden-v-united-states crime-of-violence criminal-law federal-sentencing intervening-development sentencing sentencing-guidelines statutory-interpretation texas-robbery ussg-4b1.2 |
Whether the Texas offense of simple robbery by injury, Tex. Penal Code §29.02(a)(1) constitutes a "crime of violence" under USSG §4B1.2? |
0.5 |
| 21-6387 |
Richard Barry Randolph v. Florida |
Florida |
Denied |
IFP |
apprendi-v-new-jersey capital-sentencing constitutional-interpretation criminal-procedure death-penalty due-process eighth-amendment fourteenth-amendment retroactive-law statutory-construction |
1. Whether the Florida Supreme Court's decision in Hurst v. State constitutes statutory construction of substantive law, and if so, whether the Due Pr… |
0.5 |
| 21-6405 |
Ashley McArthur v. Florida |
Florida |
Denied |
IFP |
5th-amendment 6th-amendment criminal-procedure custodial-interrogation due-process fifth-amendment involuntary-confession law-enforcement miranda-rights self-incrimination waiver-of-rights |
Whether a law enforcement officer's minimization/downplaying of a defendant's rights set forth in Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966), renders a s… |
0.5 |
| 21-6579 |
Cesar Hidrogo-Marin v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
alleyne-rule almendarez-torres appellate-procedure apprendi-rule constitutional-law criminal-law criminal-procedure due-process precedent-analysis sentencing statutory-interpretation supreme-court-review |
Whether this Court should consider the continuing validity of Almendarez- Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 244 (1998) , in light of the reasoning of … |
-1.5 |
| 21-6601 |
Austin Woods v. United States |
Sixth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
18-usc-924c co-conspirator conspiracy crime-of-violence pinkerton-liability statutory-interpretation substantive-offense |
In 1946, this Court enunciated the Pinkerton theory of liability, which permits a defendant to be held liable for a substantive offense committed by a… |
-1.5 |
| 21-6625 |
Derrick Harrell v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
certificate-of-appealability circuit-precedent circuit-split crime-of-violence criminal-law due-process federal-criminal-procedure hobbs-act physical-force sentencing statutory-interpretation |
1. Whether Hobbs Act robbery under 18 U.S.C. § 1951(b) is a crime of violence for purposes of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(A), i.e., one that "has as an elem… |
-1.5 |
| 21-6631 |
Jorge Ivan Vazquez-Medrano v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
criminal-procedure indictment jury-trial prior-conviction sentencing statutory-maximum |
Whether all facts —including the fact of a prior conviction —that increase a defendant's statutory maximum must be pleaded in the indictment and eithe… |
-1.5 |
| 21-6640 |
Kennedy Terrell Walker v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
borden-standard carjacking criminal-procedure elements-clause first-time-motion florida-robbery habeas-corpus johnson-v-united-states recidivism section-2255 sentencing violent-felony |
1. Whether a criminal defendant moving for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 for the first time should be subject to the statutory hurdles applicable to m… |
-1.5 |
| 21-6658 |
Donald Ray Johnson v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
circuit-split criminal-procedure federal-courts federal-sentencing guideline-commentary judicial-deference judicial-interpretation sentencing-guidelines statutory-construction statutory-interpretation |
Whether federal sentencing courts are bound by the illustrations found in Guideline Commentary? |
-1.5 |
| 21-6671 |
Valente Arias-Avila v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-review circuit-split criminal-sentencing due-process federal-sentencing gall-v-united-states judicial-discretion sentencing-factors standard-of-review |
I. When conducting their substantive-reasonableness review of sentences, can appellate courts reweigh the sentencing factors in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), a… |
-1.5 |
| 21-6710 |
Prince Charles Nana Yaw Owusu Boateng v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
conspiracy count-of-conviction court-of-appeals criminal-restitution loss-calculation mandatory-victims-restitution-act pattern-of-criminal-activity restitution scheme sentencing |
Under the Mandatory Victim s Restitution Act, when an offense does
not involve as an element a scheme, conspiracy, or pattern of criminal
activity, … |
-1.5 |
| 21-6010 |
Robert D. Sutton v. United States |
Seventh Circuit |
Denied |
Amici (1)IFP |
circuit-split compassionate-release criminal-justice criminal-sentencing judicial-discretion mandatory-minimum mandatory-minimums retroactivity sentence-reduction sentencing statutory-interpretation |
Under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A), a defendant may seek a sentence reduction based, in part, on "extraordinary and compelling reasons." In 2018, Congres… |
-3.5 |
| 21-6328 |
Scottie D. Allen v. Florida |
Florida |
Denied |
IFP |
capital-sentencing criminal-procedure due-process eighth-amendment jury-instructions reasonable-doubt sentencing standard-of-proof |
I. Whether the Florida Supreme Court's rejection of Petitioner's claim of error based on the jury being affirmatively misinformed about its role in th… |
-4.5 |
| 21-6373 |
Krishna Mote v. United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania |
Third Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
appeals-court civil-action criminal-matter federal-court fugitive-disentitlement judicial-review mandamus warrant-issuance writ-of-mandamus |
Whereas if a Petitioner didnot escape from custody, but was indicted and a warrant was allegedly issued on a criminal matter, does the Fugitive Disent… |
-4.5 |
| 21-6375 |
Thomas Dudney v. Jeff Macomber, Warden |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
certificate-of-appealability confrontation-clause due-process exculpatory-evidence hearsay-evidence ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel perjury sixth-amendment |
Thomas Dudney's conviction when actually innocent highlights a national issue: the unacceptably high rate of such convictions, reflected in numerous e… |
-4.5 |
| 21-6377 |
Anthony Harris v. J. Philip Morgan, Warden, et al. |
Fourth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
constitutional-rights fourteenth-amendment fourth-amendment habeas-corpus probable-cause search-and-seizure warrantless-search |
1. Did the Us. District Court crrad in ruling
that the stato
court violated petitioner's Fourth, Sixth, and Fourtewth.
Amendruts of the Unitad States … |
-4.5 |
| 21-6381 |
Russell Tinsley v. Merrill Main, et al. |
Third Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process first-amendment free-speech freedom-of-speech qualified-immunity retaliation standing |
WHEATHER THE NEW JERSEY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DENIED MR. TINSLEY 'S HIS FIRST AMENDMENT OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION (RETALIATION CLAIM AG… |
-4.5 |
| 21-6423 |
Jermaine L. Cobbs v. Michael Stephan, Warden |
Fourth Circuit |
Denied |
IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process free-speech jurisdiction standing |
Question not identified. |
-4.5 |
| 21-6429 |
Randall T. Deviney v. Florida |
Florida |
Denied |
IFP |
aggravating-factors alleyne-v-united-states apprendi-v-new-jersey capital-sentencing criminal-procedure due-process eighth-amendment fourteenth-amendment functional-elements hurst-v-florida ring-v-arizona |
I. The Due Process Clause requires the existence of an element of a crime to be determined beyond a reasonable doubt. See Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 … |
-4.5 |
| 21-6472 |
Anthony Mungin v. Florida |
Florida |
Denied |
IFP |
brady-v-maryland brady-violation constitutional-claim due-process exculpatory-evidence postconviction-motion postconviction-relief prosecutorial-misconduct |
Can Florida, consistent with Due Process and Brady v. Maryland, condone the prosecution's withholding of material exculpatory evidence beyond the time… |
-4.5 |
| 21-6764 |
In Re Eric Denorris Kennedy |
|
Denied |
IFP |
appellate-review brady-rule civil-rights constitutional-provisions due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel jurisdictional-issues legal-standards procedural-rights standing |
Question not identified. |
-4.5 |
| 21-5464 |
Steven Eric Walker v. United States, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (3)IFP |
2nd-amendment civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process government-regulation individual-liberty second-amendment self-defense standing supremacy-clause |
In District of Columbia v. Heller, this Court acknowledged that the Second Amendment protects a pre-existing fundamental right to armed self-defense w… |
-5.5 |
| 21-5667 |
David Lockmiller v. United States, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
abuse-of-discretion ashcroft-v-iqbal civil-rights constitutional-rights contingency-fee due-process federal-tort-claims-act first-amendment free-speech government-redress petition-clause |
Given the fact that the Constitution of the United States, Amendment I reads in pertinent part that "Congress shall make no law . . . abridging . . . … |
-6.0 |
| 21-5794 |
Fred M. Carrington v. Harold W. Clarke, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections |
Fourth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process eminent-domain property-rights takings |
Question not identified. |
-6.0 |
| 21-6143 |
Stephen Cameron Zyszkiewicz v. California |
California |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
civil-rights controlled-substances-act equal-protection first-amendment fourteenth-amendment fourth-amendment freedom-of-religion marijuana-prohibition religious-freedom state-federal-conflict |
Petitioner sold marijuana ostensibly as part of a California state legal nonprofit cannabis collective and possessed mescaline, ostensibly as a member… |
-6.0 |
| 21-6337 |
Kendall K. Magee v. Gloria Perry, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
administrative-remedies civil-rights due-process exhaustion-requirement federal-courts prison-litigation-reform-act prisoner-litigation prisoner-rights |
In A eriganer's Civil Rights acbon Under Ua |
LuSc & 183, Con or De & Posoner meet the.
ELhousbon Realuersent DL The. PLEA, Luhen he.
Recreves the. Re… |
-6.5 |
| 21-6363 |
Diane Arellano v. Jeremy Howard, Warden |
Sixth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
6th-amendment appellate-review civil-rights constitutional-violation criminal-procedure cumulative-effect-of-error due-process effective-assistance-of-counsel ineffective-counsel miranda-rights sixth-amendment |
I. ft go against Krr USiCcKfr. Amend. \Z£rr'ght tc> 3. Speedy trial > that- 3-fi exiting d/>^
<Lcu t 8hi'm*?s t© r«^«ste>n£i v/iolafe h?c 7 0c« her re… |
-6.5 |
| 21-6365 |
Anthony A. Patel v. Patricia Miller, et al. |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-rights congress-executive congressional-oversight due-process executive-branch judicial-authority judicial-discretion separation-of-powers standing vexatious-litigants vexatious-litigation |
1. Does a judge have the authority to deem the interests of Congress and the Executive Branch to be vexatious?
2. How severely ill are judges in Amer… |
-6.5 |
| 21-6401 |
Sherry L. Dow v. Debbie Stabenow, United States Senator, et al. |
District of Columbia |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
1st-amendment 4th-amendment civil-rights congressional-oversight constitutional-rights due-process federal-torts foreign-intelligence-surveillance government-oversight human-experimentation pro-se-complaint |
1. Extraordinary circumstances exist. The importance to the public of the issues, are extraordinary, and a matter of international, foreign, national … |
-6.5 |
| 21-6474 |
Kristie Leanne Sluder v. R. Patrick Bentancourt, et al. |
Fourth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
adoption-and-safe-families-act civil-rights constitutional-protections due-process federal-statute ku-klux-klan-act liberty-interest notice-and-hearing standing statutory-interpretation |
1. Did Macon County Department of Social Services Violate Conducted two weeks prior to my Foster daughter's placement in a group home?
2. Do foster P… |
-6.5 |
| 21-6504 |
Edward JoRodge Gladney v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
circuit-court-review civil-rights cruel-and-unusual-punishment deliberate-indifference due-process eighth-amendment precedent-interpretation prison-conditions prison-safety prisoner-rights sexual-assault |
(1) Did the Circuit Court err by contradicting this Court's precedent in Farmer v. Brennan by ruling Petitioner was obliged to show an individualized … |
-6.5 |
| 21-6541 |
Jesus Corona v. James Hill, Acting Warden |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
criminal-procedure habeas-corpus preliminary-hearing presumption-of-vindictiveness prima-facie-case procedural-default prosecutorial-discretion sentencing vindictive-prosecution |
1. Does a criminal defendant state a prima facie case of vindictive
prosecution, trigging a presumption of vindictiveness, when the day after he
succe… |
-6.5 |
| 21-6546 |
Jorge Delgado-Rivera v. Massachusetts |
Massachusetts |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
cell-phone-privacy constitutional-rights digital-privacy evidence-suppression exclusionary-rule fourth-amendment reasonable-expectation-of-privacy search-and-seizure text-messages |
Does the Fourth Amendment prevent the government from using a person's sent text messages against them when those messages are obtained through an unc… |
-6.5 |
| 21-6560 |
Carlo Donato v. United States |
Second Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
924(c) covered-offense criminal-sentencing deportation first-step-act retroactive-penalty retroactivity section-924(c) sentencing stacking statutory-interpretation |
Whether, under the First Step Act, Act 403(a) Title 18 U.S.C. Section 924(c) modify penalty the covered offense Act, due to the fact that the statutor… |
-6.5 |
| 21-6595 |
Ronnie Lee Hightower v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-procedure civil-rights due-process equal-protection free-speech standing |
Whether the District Court denied the Petitioner's constitutional right to a substantive due process under the Fifth Amendment by the lower court's in… |
-6.5 |
| 21-6599 |
Jeffrey Clinton Michalik v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-rights constitutional-rights custodial-interrogation fifth-amendment fourth-amendment law-enforcement-seizure miranda-warnings seizure |
1. Does the holding in Torres v. Madrid, 141 S. Ct. 989 (2021) that the torching of an individual by law enforcement to guide or restrain movement is … |
-6.5 |
| 21-6609 |
Christopher Coffer v. United States |
Sixth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
criminal-procedure criminal-sentencing defendant-health due-process health-issues judicial-discretion medical-disadvantage mitigation-factors sentencing sentencing-guidelines sentencing-variance variance |
What is the extent of medical disadvantage that a
defendant must present in order to secure a variance
based on ill health? |
-6.5 |
| 21-6614 |
Mario Martell Spencer v. United States |
Eighth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
commerce-clause criminal-law fifth-amendment hobbs-act interstate-commerce sentencing sentencing-enhancement witness-tampering |
1. For intrastate robberies that do not otherwise affect "commerce over which the United States has jurisdiction," 18 U.S.C. §1951(b)(3), does the Hob… |
-6.5 |
| 21-6618 |
Jamie Matsuba and Takaharo Thomas Matsuba v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
27-year-old-opinion due-process judicial-interpretation legal-precedent loss-calculation mortgage-fraud rents-gained sentencing-guidelines |
Whether a loss calculation determined using "rents gained" in a mortgage fraud case violates due process when it is based on a single 27-year-old opin… |
-6.5 |
| 21-6621 |
Valentine Okonkwo v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
4th-amendment administrative-search criminal-prosecution dea dea-inspection due-process forfeiture-judgment prescription-fraud warrant writ-of-audita-querela |
1. Did the lower court err for ruling that an administrative search, without a warrant, ostensibly conducted by a DEA Diversionary inspector was lawfu… |
-6.5 |
| 21-6623 |
Gustav Kloszewski v. United States |
Second Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
attorney-client-privilege constitutional-rights court-appointed-counsel criminal-procedure fifth-amendment ineffective-assistance-of-counsel sixth-amendment |
Was Kloszewski's Fifth and Sixth amendment rights violated when court appointed counsel divulged conversations of other uncharged/unrelated offenses i… |
-6.5 |
| 21-6629 |
Jimmy Steele v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-review civil-rights constitutional-review criminal-procedure due-process first-step-act judicial-interpretation retroactivity sentencing state-court statutory-interpretation |
The question for review is whether, under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) and the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984, Congress intended that reasons in the first insta… |
-6.5 |
| 21-6634 |
Roy Cornell Johnson v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
assistance-of-counsel constitutional-right constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process fifth-circuit-standard ineffective-assistance-of-counsel pro-se-representation right-to-counsel sentencing sentencing-stage |
1. Was the Petitioner afforded his Constitutional Right to accurate assistance of Counsel in his sentencing stage.
2. Did Petitioner fail to prosecut… |
-6.5 |
| 21-6642 |
Tre Reshawn Tate v. United States |
Sixth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
application-note criminal-law dangerous-weapon judicial-deference kisor-v-wilkie possession robbery sentencing-guidelines statutory-interpretation |
Is the application note defining "dangerous weapon" overly broad under Kisor v. Wilkie, 139 S. Ct. 2400 (2019) by defining "possession" of a "dangerou… |
-6.5 |
| 21-6643 |
Leonus Stevenson Peterson v. United States |
Fourth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-circuit appellate-review circuit-split criminal-procedure due-process fourth-circuit knowing-and-voluntary miscarriage-of-justice plea-waiver standard-of-review |
Did the Fourth Circuit err in finding that Petitioner's plea waiver was knowing and voluntary and then applying a stricter standard than a number of o… |
-6.5 |
| 21-6644 |
Ashot Minasyan v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appeal-waiver criminal-procedure due-process plea-agreement plea-bargaining prosecutorial-misconduct sentencing voluntary-plea |
Whether Minasyan's waiver of appeal is unenforceable for the following reasons: because it was not knowing, intelligent and voluntary, and because Min… |
-6.5 |
| 21-6645 |
Robert Brandon Bilus v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
circuit-court constitutional-interpretation criminal-procedure due-process judicial-precedent jurisdiction plea-bargaining precedent sixth-amendment |
Whether the Eleventh Circuit entered a decision that misapplies the precedent of this Court and as a result, violates the Sixth Amendment to the Unite… |
-6.5 |
| 21-6646 |
Pedro Alvarado v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
18-usc-111 18-usc-924 borden-v-united-states consent-search criminal-conviction criminal-law fourth-amendment ruse-search statutory-interpretation violent-crime |
I. WHETHER, IN LIGHT OF THE COURT'S RULING IN BORDEN V. UNITED STATES, 593 U.S. _ (2021), ALVARADO'S CONVICTION UNDER 18 U.S.C. §111(a) AND (b) QUALIF… |
-6.5 |
| 21-6656 |
Azizjon Rakhmatov v. United States |
Second Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-waiver constitutional-rights cruel-and-unusual-punishment due-process equal-protection guilty-plea plea-agreement right-to-appeal right-to-counsel sentencing-bias |
Whether a sentence based on racial and ethnic bias can be appealed pursuant to the Constitutional rights to due process and equal protection of the la… |
-6.5 |
| 21-6668 |
Shane Patrick Sprague v. United States |
Eleventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
animal-welfare-act conspiracy due-process eleventh-circuit evidence-sufficiency insufficient-evidence jury-deliberation jury-deliberations supervisory-jurisdiction |
Whether in the exercise of its supervisory jurisdiction over the United States Courts, this Court should correct the correctable injustice that occurr… |
-6.5 |
| 21-6670 |
Eric Beverly v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
administration-of-justice bank-robbery beyond-reasonable-doubt criminal-appeal criminal-procedure due-process evidence-sufficiency federal-jurisdiction fifth-circuit jury-conviction standard-of-review sufficiency-of-evidence |
I. On Appeal ERIC BEVERLY nged the sufficiency of the evidence for the following jury convictions: (1) four counts of aiding and abetting bank robbery… |
-6.5 |
| 21-6676 |
Mario Murillo-Mora v. United States |
Eighth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
certificate-of-appealability circuit-court district-court due-process garza-v-idaho habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel judicial-review precedent-interpretation roe-v-flores-ortega |
Whether Circuit Courts of Appeals can Properly Summarily Deny Issuance of a Certificate of Appealability to a Habeas Petitioner when the District Cour… |
-6.5 |
| 21-6679 |
Juan Jarmon v. United States |
Third Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-review circuit-court-conflict conspiracy conspiracy-law crack-cocaine criminal-law evidence evidentiary-standard sentencing sentencing-guidelines standard-of-review united-states-v-pressler |
Whether the Third Circuit Court of Appeals entered a decision in conflict with the decision of United States v. Pressler where the evidence presented … |
-6.5 |
| 21-6687 |
Rory Lee Zirkelbach v. United States |
Eighth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
18-usc-3582 career-offender district-court-discretion extraordinary-and-compelling extraordinary-reasons sentence-reduction sentencing-disparity sentencing-error sentencing-guideline statutory-interpretation |
Did the district court err when it imposed an extratextual limitation on its statutory authority to determine what amounts to an "extraordinary and co… |
-6.5 |
| 21-6695 |
John Scott Cramer v. Missouri |
Missouri |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
collateral-consequences counsel-advice criminal-defense due-process ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel parole parole-eligibility sixth-amendment |
Whether the Sixth Amendment protects criminal defendants who rely on defective advice from counsel regarding critical, non-deportation collateral cons… |
-6.5 |
| 21-6700 |
Tremaine Rashon Wray v. Dennis Bush, Warden |
Fourth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
appellate-procedure constitutional-rights due-process effective-assistance-of-counsel expert-witness forensic-evidence fourteenth-amendment ineffective-assistance-of-counsel post-conviction-review sixth-amendment |
Whether Petitioner was denied his Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel at the PCR hearing, by trial Counsel's failure to object to… |
-6.5 |
| 21-6706 |
Billy Dean Smith v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
burden-of-proof due-process fifth-amendment hearsay judicial-discretion sentencing uncharged-felony |
Did the district court violate Mr. Smith's Fifth Amendment Due Process rights by relying on unreliable, unsupported hearsay to, first, find that Mr. S… |
-6.5 |
| 21-6707 |
Antonio Turner v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
3553(a)-factors administrative-remedy bureau-of-prisons compassionate-release criminal-sentencing extraordinary-and-compelling-reasons extraordinary-compelling-reasons first-step-act sentence-reduction sentencing-guidelines |
Whether the district court erred by denying Mr. Turner's Motion for Sentence Reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). |
-6.5 |
| 21-6708 |
Richard Max Tafoya v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process freedom-of-movement fundamental-rights international-travel judicial-review standard-of-review travel-restrictions |
What standard applies in reviewing the constitutionality of restrictions on the right to international travel? |
-6.5 |
| 21-6711 |
Darius Smith v. United States |
District of Columbia |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
competency due-process effective-assistance guilty-plea ineffective-assistance-of-counsel intellectual-disabilities intellectual-disability mental-competency mental-illness plea-proceeding sixth-amendment |
1. Whether Petitioner's Fifth Amendment right to Due Process was violated where the record demonstrated that he had mental illness and intellectual di… |
-6.5 |
| 21-6718 |
Gregory Chester and William Ford v. United States |
Seventh Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
apprendi apprendi-doctrine conspiracy-sentencing criminal-procedure grand-jury indictment presentment-clause sentencing statutory-sentencing superseding-indictment |
Whether, where Apprendi and its progeny requires the petit jury to return special findings as to individual conspiracy defendants to justify an increa… |
-6.5 |
| 21-6732 |
Julio Cesar Cardenas v. United States |
Fifth Circuit |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
castro-v-united-states civil-rights due-process fifth-circuit habeas-corpus mandates nonfrivolous-claims notice-and-opportunity procedural-rule slack-v-mcdaniel supreme-court supreme-court-mandate |
1. HAS THE FIFTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS EFFECTIVELY ESTABLISHED A PROCEDURAL RULE TO EFFACE yMUli ABRIDGE . OR ABROGATE THE SUPREME COURT*S • MANDAT… |
-6.5 |
| 21-6735 |
Gregory A. Rollins v. Illinois |
Illinois |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
child-photography constitutional-challenge content-based content-based-restriction first-amendment government-interest intermediate-scrutiny public-place strict-scrutiny |
This Court has held that a statute restricting photographs, videos, or sound recordings is presumptively invalid under the First Amendment to the Cons… |
-6.5 |