No. 21-704
Oklahoma v. Samantha Ann Perales
Tags: 140 S.Ct. 2452 (2020) should be overruled criminal-appellate-review criminal-law federal-indian-law jurisdictional-challenge mcgirt-precedent native-american-law native-american-rights oklahoma-criminal-law oklahoma-sovereignty overruling-precedent precedent-review stare-decisis statutory-interpretation tribal-jurisdiction
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2022-01-21
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma should be overruled
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S.Ct. 2452 (2020), should be overruled. ii LIST OF PROCEEDINGS Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals No. F-2018-383 Samantha Ann Perales, Appellant v. The State of Oklahoma, Appellee Date of Final Opinion: August 12, 2021 Oklahoma District Court (Delaware County) No. CF-2015-355 The State of Oklahoma, Plaintiff v. Samantha Ann Perales, Defendant Date of Judgment and Sentence: April 6, 2018
Docket Entries
2022-01-24
Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent GRANTED.
2022-01-24
Petition DENIED.
2022-01-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/21/2022.
2021-12-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/14/2022.
2021-12-15
Brief of respondent Samantha A. Perales in opposition filed.
2021-12-15
Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Samantha A. Perales.
2021-12-10
Brief amicus curiae of Cherokee Nation filed.
2021-11-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 15, 2021)
Attorneys
Cherokee Nation
Chrissi Ross Nimmo — Cherokee Nation, Amicus
Chrissi Ross Nimmo — Cherokee Nation, Amicus
Oklahoma
Mithun Mansinghani — Solicitor General, Petitioner
Mithun Mansinghani — Solicitor General, Petitioner
Samantha A. Perales
Zachary Charles Schauf — Jenner & Block, LLP, Respondent
Zachary Charles Schauf — Jenner & Block, LLP, Respondent