Whether Congress intended a sentencing reduction under the First Step Act of 2018 to apply retroactively to defendants sentenced before the Act's enactment, and how that determination should be made by district courts

QUESTION PRESENTED FoR RENEW _ | | “The queshon for Sh pN Q CANAL V5 0 ; | opty WAROCTONER Ox { col wnpression, Sek \5, Nhe. ‘So S WE ww aks!" CY. X istotd 80.S.C..% 3532 ODD) S A eo Act of 208, whednor “onaress intended a i. ae cea.sons in Nhe Hest wskance, ond wost bin be. before Avsheck Cour ts, CaN appraprate . lc sey 2dS53O@ Coc! ars ot denn rebet by od oniks! GDLECSS MN Vt RAdS @) Toc korS witha \ fiche «) A at x WOON QO w 4 stents of ¢ SRCEORANININGN WCAN ace thea (RSONS, | : . | he ogestio cecontred ror Te VOWS CoSP 1S Yas’ (\ N ha the Ye ower cour ected by Q ate lef _ __Kesed on tts assessment of She S3O teckycs wither , ost eechinn a ddkecrmaction on {he enctence 6 exitsostinoty low Wes Cen SIO 2 ccost @ ok Yow \ | sed Jeersion Qs \ or > assessmankch the ewer : | —__~_{mppeat” 10) the ostint of N\ Aevk of Cechoract. 2 “TABLE OE CONTI . . : oo Pp QUESTION PRESENTED FoR RENIE! i INTERESTED PARTIES . : HABA Ee 0€ Col (ENT . . Tw TASLE of AUT \Es PTNDEX 0 NDULES. _ Vv YPINIONS BELOW J __ STW i" SPICTION. .. 2 2 2 {ST = = Sure NL PROVISIONS | ST INVOLVED IN THIS REWEW 4 3.4 |