No. 21-6618
Jamie Matsuba and Takaharo Thomas Matsuba v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 27-year-old-opinion due-process judicial-interpretation legal-precedent loss-calculation mortgage-fraud rents-gained sentencing-guidelines
Key Terms:
Securities Immigration
Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2022-01-21
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a loss calculation determined using 'rents gained' in a mortgage fraud case violates due process
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether a loss calculation determined using “rents gained” in a mortgage fraud case violates due process when it is based on a single 27-year-old opinion that refers to a sentencing guideline (and related application notes) that are no longer valid law? -ii
Docket Entries
2022-01-24
Petition DENIED.
2022-01-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/21/2022.
2021-12-30
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-12-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 14, 2022)
Attorneys
Takaharo Matsuba
Marisa Conroy — Law Office of Marisa L. D. Conroy, Petitioner
Marisa Conroy — Law Office of Marisa L. D. Conroy, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent