No. 21-6504
Edward JoRodge Gladney v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: circuit-court-review civil-rights cruel-and-unusual-punishment deliberate-indifference due-process eighth-amendment precedent-interpretation prison-conditions prison-safety prisoner-rights sexual-assault
Latest Conference:
2022-01-21
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Circuit Court err by contradicting this Court's precedent in Farmer v. Brennan by ruling Petitioner was obliged to show an individualized risk to sexual assault?
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED (1) Did the Circuit Court err by contradicting this Court’s precedent in Farmer v. Brennan by ruling Petitioner was obliged to show an individualized risk to sexual assault? (2) Did the Circuit Court err by determining that the record lacked evidence of any individualized risk to Petitioner of which guards were aware? '
Docket Entries
2022-01-24
Petition DENIED.
2022-01-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/21/2022.
2022-01-03
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-09-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 3, 2022)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent