Whether there is a conflict of state and federal law with regards to marijuana/hashish and/or mescaline

QUESTIONS PRESENTED Petitioner sold marijuana ostensibly as part of a California state legal nonprofit cannabis collective and possessed mescaline, ostensibly as a member of a Native American Church, though the trial court forbid this evidence at trial. 1. Whether there is a conflict of state and federal law with regards to marijuana/ hashish and/or mescaline. 2. Whether or not was an error in forbidding evidence of a legal nonprofit medical cannabis collective and bonafide religious use of cannabis/mescaline as a member of a Native American Church. 3. Whether or not should even be considered criminal activity at all given that the Controlled Substances Act is unconstitutional, given the threat to freedom of religion, constitutional violations related to First, Fourth, Eight, Fourteenth (Equal Protection Clause). 4. Whether or not marijuana/hashish is a schedule I controlled substance (no medicinal value). . 5. Whether or not mescaline is a schedule I controlled substance (no medicinal value). . 6. Whether or not the Controlled Substances Act, the War on Drugs, and cannabis/ : mescaline prohibition are unconstitutional. :