No. 21-6645
Robert Brandon Bilus v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: circuit-court constitutional-interpretation criminal-procedure due-process judicial-precedent jurisdiction plea-bargaining precedent sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2022-01-21
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Eleventh Circuit entered a decision that misapplies the precedent of this Court and as a result, violates the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED 1. Whether the Eleventh Circuit entered a decision that misapplies the precedent of this Court and as a result, violates the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution? i
Docket Entries
2022-01-24
Petition DENIED.
2022-01-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/21/2022.
2021-12-30
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-12-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 18, 2022)
2021-11-08
Application (21A139) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until December 9, 2021.
2021-10-27
Application (21A139) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from November 9, 2021 to December 24, 2021, submitted to Justice Thomas.
Attorneys
Robert Bilus
Rachael Elizabeth Reese — O'Brien Hatfield Reese, P.A., Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent