No. 21-899
Lauren Rosecan v. United States
Response Waived
Experienced Counsel
Tags: collateral-order-doctrine criminal-information criminal-procedure due-process felony grand-jury grand-jury-clause interlocutory-appeal jurisdictional-defect pretrial-motion
Key Terms:
FifthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy
FifthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy
Latest Conference:
2022-01-21
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the denial of a pretrial motion to dismiss a criminal information that charges, in violation of the Grand Jury Clause, felony offenses without petitioner's consent is interlocutorily appealable under the collateral order doctrine?
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the denial of a pretrial motion to dismiss acriminal information that charges, in violation of the Grand Jury Clause, felony offenses without petitioner’s consent is interlocutorily appealable under the collateral order doctrine?
Docket Entries
2022-01-24
Petition DENIED.
2022-01-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/21/2022.
2021-12-30
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-12-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 18, 2022)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent