| 25-698 |
Noris Babb v. Douglas A. Collins, Secretary of Veterans Affairs |
Eleventh Circuit |
2025-12-17 |
Pending |
Response Waived |
age-discrimination employment-discrimination federal-employees sex-discrimination summary-judgment title-vii |
Whether federal District Court jury instructions and decisions on motions for summary judgment must be consistent with Babb v. Wilkie's statutory fram… |
| 25-6277 |
Sonal N. Desai v. David Steiner, Postmaster General |
Fourth Circuit |
2025-12-03 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
civil-rights eeo-claim employment-discrimination federal-employees postal-service workplace-harassment |
Question not identified. |
| 24-495 |
Lebene Konan v. United States Postal Service, et al. |
Fifth Circuit |
2024-10-31 |
Denied |
Relisted (2) |
circuit-split equal-protection federal-employees intracorporate-conspiracy ku-klux-klan-act section-1985-3 |
Whether federal employees can be liable under Section 1985(3) and whether the intracorporate conspiracy doctrine applies to such claims |
| 23-7072 |
Martin Akerman v. Lloyd J. Austin, III, Secretary of Defense, et al. |
Fourth Circuit |
2024-03-26 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP |
accountability administrative-law civil-rights data-integrity due-process federal-employees federal-jurisdiction judicial-review transparency whistleblower-protection |
Did the Fourth Circuit Court's consolidation of appeals and selective review exacerbate the case's complexity, undermining the principles of thorough … |
| 23-6736 |
Christopher R. Chin-Young v. Department of the Army |
Federal Circuit |
2024-02-13 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
administrative-law civil-rights due-process employment-at-will federal-employees federal-employment mspb reassignment whistle-blower |
Whether covered Federal employees under employment-at-will have an absolute right to constitutionally sound due process procedures under MSPB administ… |
| 23-343 |
Donald Martin, Jr., et al. v. United States |
Federal Circuit |
2023-10-02 |
Denied |
Relisted (2) |
anti-deficiency-act fair-labor-standards-act federal-employees government-employee-fair-treatment-act minimum-wage overtime overtime-compensation wage-obligations |
Do the Anti-Deficiency Act or the Government Employee Fair Treatment Act displace, modify or require a special narrower interpretation of the FLSA obl… |
| 23-256 |
Suleiman Abdu Ibrahim v. Department of the Interior |
Fifth Circuit |
2023-09-18 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
administrative-law administrative-procedure agency-action civil-procedure civil-rights due-process employment-discrimination federal-employee-rights federal-employees summary-judgment title-vii |
Whether federal employees' rights are determined under statutes that require all personnel actions affecting employees or applicants to be made free f… |
| 22-1193 |
Jeffry Thul v. Deb Haaland, Secretary of the Interior, et al. |
Sixth Circuit |
2023-06-09 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
civil-rights discrimination due-process equal-protection expedited-proceedings federal-employees federal-employment post-traumatic-stress-disorder service-of-process |
Whether service of process is relevant in a psychological disability case |
| 22-1118 |
Cody Adams, et al. v. United States |
Federal Circuit |
2023-05-16 |
Denied |
Amici (1)Relisted (2) |
civil-rights due-process federal-employees federal-employment hazardous-duty-pay proximity-exposure regulatory-interpretation statutory-entitlement statutory-interpretation virulent-biologicals |
Whether federal employees who work in close proximity to individuals infected with virulent biologicals are entitled to hazardous duty pay under the r… |
| 22-786 |
Michael Faris v. Department of the Air Force |
Federal Circuit |
2023-02-21 |
Denied |
Response WaivedRelisted (2) |
burden-of-proof comparability federal-employees leave-of-absence pension-benefits reframing-contentions uniformed-services userra |
Are federal employees considered a 'person' for the purposes of USERRA? |
| 21-7399 |
Rosalind A. Clayton v. Louis DeJoy, Postmaster General, et al. |
Eighth Circuit |
2022-03-17 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
age-discrimination civil-rights due-process eeoc-administrative-remedies employment-discrimination equal-protection exhaustion-of-administrative-remedies federal-employees subject-matter-jurisdiction title-vii |
Where the Courts decision egregiously conflicts with Supreme Court Fort Bend County, Texas v. Davis 18-525 and 29 C.F.R. 1613.513, as amend. Was petit… |
| 21-1134 |
Bryan Adams v. Department of Homeland Security |
Federal Circuit |
2022-02-16 |
Denied |
Amici (1) |
active-duty cross-reference differential-pay federal-employees military-reserves national-guard statutory-interpretation |
Whether 10 U.S.C. § 12301(d) is 'a provision of law referred to in section 101(a)(13)(B) of title 10 |
| 21-6821 |
Francis Schaeffer Cox v. United States |
Ninth Circuit |
2022-01-11 |
Denied |
Response WaivedIFP |
conspiracy-liability contingent-conspiracy criminal-intent federal-employees federal-jurisdiction feola-test martial-law stalinesque-martial-law subjective-belief sufficiency-challenge |
Whether a contingent conspiracy may be based on a condition outside the conspirators' control that they subjectively believed was likely to occur, eve… |
| 21-777 |
Blake Edward Halfacre v. United States |
Tenth Circuit |
2021-11-29 |
Denied |
Response Waived |
administrative-law employment-rights exclusive-provisions federal-employees federal-employment-compensation-act federal-tort-claims-act light-duty-job light-duty-job-offer united-states-court-of-appeals workers-compensation |
Are the 'exclusive provisions' in the FECA (Federal Employment Compensation Act) applicable, or available to Federal Employees who also have no formal… |
| 19-71 |
FNU Tanzin, et al. v. Muhammad Tanvir, et al. |
Second Circuit |
2019-07-12 |
Judgment Issued |
Amici (15)Relisted (2) |
administrative-law civil-rights constitutional-rights damages damages-liability due-process federal-employees free-speech religious-freedom rfra standing statutory-interpretation |
Whether the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1998, 42 U.S.C. 2000bb et seqg., permits suits seeking money damages against individual federal emplo… |