Whether federal employees' rights are determined under statutes that require all personnel actions affecting employees or applicants to be made free from any discrimination

QUESTIONS PRESENTED Federal employees’ rights are determined under | statues which require that ‘all personnel actions ‘ | effecting employees or applicants for employment. , ...In executive agencies as defined in Title 5. | Shall be made free from any discrimination. ...” See 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-16(a) (race, color, religion, sex, or national origin), (added) ADEA 29 U.S.C. § 633a(a), (age). THE QUESTIONS PRESENTED ARE: 1. Whether the United States Court of Appeals’ Fifth Circuit has errored when it stated: . “ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED,” and “IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Appellant pay to Appellee the costs on appeal to be taxed by the Clerk of this court.” (Order and Opinion, App.1a-6a). 2. Whether the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana has errored when: “not permitted, denied, give no time or opportunity to plaintiff to present his case or give evidence”, throughout a four-day trial which was conducted from Aug 1, 2022, to Aug 4, 2022. (Minute Entry —Summary of Trial Proceedings, App.24a-29a). 3. Whether the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana has errored when it stated: ; ‘IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, having granted summary judgment, there is judgment in favor of defendant, Deb Haaland, Secretary, Department i : of Interior, and against plaintiff Suleiman Ibrahim dismissing with prejudice plaintiffs age, race, gender, and religious discrimination and hostile work environment claims under Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e; each party to bear its own costs. (App.22a-23a). “IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that there is judgment in ; favor of defendant, Secretary Deb Haaland, Depart of Interior, and against plaintiff Suleiman Ibrahim, dismissing with prejudice plaintiffs nation origin discrimination, retaliation, and retaliatory hostile work environment claims on the Court’s finding at trial of no evidence to support plaintiffs national ; origin discrimination, retaliation, or retaliatory hostile work environment claims under Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e; each party to bear its own costs. (App.22a-23a). | . | iii |