Where the Courts decision egregiously conflicts with Supreme Court Fort Bend County, Texas v. Davis 18-525 and 29 C.F.R. 1613.513, as amend. Was petitioner's 'due-process-rights' violated?

Question Presented 1. Where the Courts decision egregiously conflicts with Supreme Court Fort Bend County, Texas v. Davis 18-525 and 29 C.F.R. 1613.513, as amend. Was petitioner's “due process rights” violated? When the Appellate Court affirmed the judgment of the | District Court in dismissing petitioner's age claims 29 U. S. C. 621 ef. seq. for “lack subject matter jurisdiction”, on the basis the petitioner “failed to exhaust her EEOC | administrative remedies” where the above statue eliminates the exhaustion requirement for federal employees on age claims. 2. Did the district court correctly calculated APWU's 6-month time barred timeline? 3. After a case sat in the EEOC more than 180 days is it considered exhausted? 4. Cana court deny a motion to reconsider that violates the 14 Amendment rights? 5. USPS affirmative defense is a perjured statement “Plaintiff failed to exhaust her EEOC administrative remedies”. Does this violate petitioner due process rights? 6. Was the petitioner entitled to an excusable neglect on her 2" extension of time? 7. Did USPS timely raise its lack of subject matter jurisdiction claim Mar. 24, 2020? 8. When.a black employee is injured at work by white co-worker approved OWCP, never received any OWCP compensation benefits for her injury or absences; USPS used the approved OWCP absences against the employee attendance record to deny job reassignment. Is this fair & equal treatment for the black employee to be approved for OWCP, benefits and. not receive OWCP benefits? 9. Did district court abuse authority taking 19 days to respond 2" extension of time? 10. Did district court violate petitioner 14th amendment rights, untimely entered 2AC? 11.1AC 4AC the first 8 Exhibits A-1A-8 are paycheck stubs, is direct evidence that USPS stolen 21 days of COP wages while I was disabled. App. C 93a page ID 112a -124a: Does Ledbetter Fair Pay Act protect older, black, disabled women? 12.1In the petitioner 1AC App. C 93a there are 22 paragraphs of factual allegations missing from the district court records. The district judge affirmed plaintiff filed 19 pages and 74 paragraphs of factual allegations complaint. App. B at 21a. The court deprived me of an opportunity to be heard to present evidence that the case was well pled in the1AC. Are the missing court records a due process violation? i LIST THE PARTIES OF THE PROCEEDING Rosalind A. Clayton Petitioner Louis DeJoy Postmaster General United States Postal Service (USPS) and America Postal Workers Union AFL-CIO (APWU) Respondents RELATED CASES Rosalind Clayton v. Megan J. Brennan Postmaster General USPS and American Postal Worker Union APWU AFL-ACIO. 4:18-cv-01039 JAR. The | Postmaster General changed names Louis DeJoy June 15, 2020. | Artis v. Bernanke 630 F. 3d 1031, 1033 (D.C. Cir. Jan. 11, 2011) The District Court | dismissed plaintiffs Title VII claim for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. U.S. | Supreme Court concluded the secretaires completed informal counseling, vacated the | dismissal of the case remanded the case back to the district court. | Fort Bend County Texas, v Davis, No.18-525 (5" Cir. June 3, 2019) The District Court dismissed the Title VII claim for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. The | Supreme Court concluded that Davis failure to check the religion box on the charging document is not jurisdictional, remanded the case back to district court. The Supreme Court held that Title Vil charge filing requirement is not jurisdictional. ii |