No. 21-6679

Juan Jarmon v. United States

Lower Court: Third Circuit
Docketed: 2021-12-20
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review circuit-court-conflict conspiracy conspiracy-law crack-cocaine criminal-law evidence evidentiary-standard sentencing sentencing-guidelines standard-of-review united-states-v-pressler
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2022-01-21
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Third Circuit Court of Appeals entered a decision in conflict with the decision of United States v. Pressler

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

question presented is: Whether the Third Circuit Court of Appeals entered a decision in conflict with the decision of United States v. Pressler where the evidence presented at trial showed several loosely connected conspiracies as opposed to one overarching conspiracy. The second question presented is: Whether the Third Circuit Court of Appeals entered a decision in conflict with the decision of United States v. Johnson and United States v. Diaz where the sentencing court’s factual finding attributing more than 280 grams of crack cocaine was clearly erroneous because the finding was unsupported by substantial evidence, lacked adequate evidentiary support in the record, and was against the clear weight of the evidence. i

Docket Entries

2022-01-24
Petition DENIED.
2022-01-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/21/2022.
2021-12-30
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2021-12-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 19, 2022)

Attorneys

Juan Jarmon
Maureen Claire CogginsMaureen Coggins, Attorney at Law, Petitioner
Maureen Claire CogginsMaureen Coggins, Attorney at Law, Petitioner
United States of America
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent