Whether the petitioner's successive habeas corpus petition should be granted

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Tf. Libetber the. agphtants Successive. Habeas Le Ahan sahish) Ake re quicen LD feclona 4 Cou. 4daSSe aad 52254 * cat of Sections #4 2. bthetler state. sentencing statutes MCAS4 FT-3-2) and $497-7-3 Civca 1997-1989 ce Vaid lor VAqAen es ya wolatian ot Phe q pie oats Sth aR) S CLA right to Notile mM haguaye Lommon 10a person ob ’ ordinary inteligence.s 4 at in fringed on his right ty ba. Je gall sentenced TH UbCLA. Bhasen vs Lav feo! Shakes 57 US. SY 11015); Kalender v. Lawson Vol US.384 | 4o 9455, /03 8.4 ESS, 75 Led Sel 903: Fay Now 3972 US 390963). Q. hihether the opp chats tout foctbading frDless concerning the. gopheant 5 Achasol Lanecence t/arm » Brady N/a bic for SUfpsebs) On of motion bal Prone yecords, Lavolua tary’ Men and. In elle chive Assrstince af Counsel L1ainr mateciolh deh creat fay the facts jf yewed rn bight of the. evidences would Show but foe CONS jb Bonal yor MA (eason hk, Jucos would hind the gophe anhis guilt ehadeable 2A ILS. 04. 9§ 224 2NXB IM XG),