No. 21-6634
Roy Cornell Johnson v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: assistance-of-counsel constitutional-right constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process fifth-circuit-standard ineffective-assistance-of-counsel pro-se-representation right-to-counsel sentencing sentencing-stage
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2022-01-21
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was the Petitioner afforded his Constitutional Right to accurate assistance of Counsel in his sentencing stage
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED -1. Was the Petitioner afforded his Constitutional Right to accurate assistance of Counsel in his sentencing stage. 2. Did Petitioner fail to prosecute his case considering the standard measured by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. . Faretta v. California 422 U.S. 806 95 S.Ct. 2525 45 L.ed.2d 562 (1975) Makelvey v. AT&T Tech Inc. 789 £.2d 1518 (11th Cir. 1986) Love v. Bendily, 567 F.Appx 250 (Sth Cir. 2014) -ii. .
Docket Entries
2022-01-24
Petition DENIED.
2022-01-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/21/2022.
2021-12-30
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-10-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 14, 2022)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent