Whether the Florida Bar's compulsory membership and dues violate the First Amendment right to refrain from subsidizing the organization's political or ideological activities

QUESTIONS PRESENTED... . oS The Florida Bar (“the Bar”), an integrated Bar ~ association, is the statewide regulatory organization for all lawyers licensed to practice law in Florida. ce : Thirty-three states, U.S. territories, the ; Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and the District of . Columbia, vest in an integrated bar, the State’s police , : power to regulate its members’ occupational license. : An integrated Bar, has two things in common (i) : _compulsory membership; and (ii) dues as a condition ; of practicing law in the State. The Bar’s activities fall : within the First Amendment right of its members to ; refrain from subsidizing the organization’s political or ideological activities. Such is the basis of this Court’s opinion in Keller v. State Bar of California, 496 U.S. 1 (1990). The Questions Presented are: 1. Whether this Court’s First Amendment speech and petitioning precedents on the fundamental constitutional right to access the court as : . expressed in Bounds v. Smith, 430 U.S. 817 (1977) and progeny guarantee Petitioner a remedy and rejection of the Fifth District Court of Appeal Per Curiam Affirmed (“PCA”) Order, adopting the trial court’s Opinion that a plaintiff lack standing to sue the Florida Bar. 2. Whether a trial or appellate judge, with an . economic interest, in a membership in good ; standing in the Respondent bar association, ‘ ii : and over whom the Respondent exercise -. : " . continuing discipline for acts on the bench, : ; after leaving the bench, violate a plaintiff ‘s : Due Process right, guaranteed by the Fifth : . , and Fourteenth Amendments, when presiding ; ; in an adversarial lawsuit against the Bar. : _ 3. Whether the Fifth District Court of Appeal is ; correct that the Bar is absolutely immune . from suit. : iii : .