No. 21-6623
Gustav Kloszewski v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: attorney-client-privilege constitutional-rights court-appointed-counsel criminal-procedure fifth-amendment ineffective-assistance-of-counsel sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2022-01-21
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Kloszewski's Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights were violated when court-appointed counsel divulged conversations about other uncharged/unrelated offenses in response to an allegation of ineffective assistance of counsel
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Was Kloszewski’s Fifth and Sixth amendment rights violated when court a appointed counsel divulged conversations of other uncharged/unrelated offenses in response and unrelated to the allegation of ineffective assistance of counsel ii
Docket Entries
2022-01-24
Petition DENIED.
2022-01-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/21/2022.
2021-12-30
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-12-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 14, 2022)
Attorneys
Gustav Kloszewski
Gustav Kloszewski — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent