No. 21-6695
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: collateral-consequences counsel-advice criminal-defense due-process ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel parole parole-eligibility sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
DueProcess Immigration
DueProcess Immigration
Latest Conference:
2022-01-21
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Sixth Amendment protects criminal defendants who rely on defective advice from counsel regarding critical, non-deportation collateral consequences of a conviction, such as ineligibility for parole from a 'life' sentence
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the Sixth Amendment protects criminal defendants who rely on defective advice from counsel regarding critical, non-deportation collateral consequences of a conviction, such as ineligibility for parole from a “life” sentence. i
Docket Entries
2022-01-24
Petition DENIED.
2022-01-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/21/2022.
2022-01-03
Waiver of right of respondent Missouri to respond filed.
2021-11-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 20, 2022)
Attorneys
John Scott Cramer
Melinda K. Pendergraph — State Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
Missouri
Shaun J. Mackelprang — Missouri Attorney General's Office, Respondent