No. 21-6676

Mario Murillo-Mora v. United States

Lower Court: Eighth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-12-21
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: certificate-of-appealability circuit-court district-court due-process garza-v-idaho habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel judicial-review precedent-interpretation roe-v-flores-ortega
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2022-01-21
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether Circuit Courts of Appeals can Properly Summarily Deny Issuance of a Certificate of Appealability to a Habeas Petitioner

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED L Whether Circuit Courts of Appeals can Properly Summarily Deny Issuance of a Certificate of Appealability to a Habeas Petitioner when the District Court Has Declined to Engage in the Analysis Required Under this Court’s Precedent in Roe v. Flores-Ortega, 528 U.S. 470 (2000) and Garza v. Idaho, 189 S. Ct. 738 (2019). | | | | Bs LIST OF RELATED CASES | e United States v. Murillo-Mora, No. 15-cr-2015, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of lowa. Amended Judgment entered Oct. 17, 2017; amended to correct clerical error Dec. 11, 2020. e United States v. Murillo-Mora, 703 F. App’x. 435 (8th Cir. 2017), No. 16-3525, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. Judgment entered Jul. 25, 2017. | e United States v. Murillo-Mora, No. 21-1252, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. Judgment entered Feb. 11, 2021. ii

Docket Entries

2022-01-24
Petition DENIED.
2022-01-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/21/2022.
2022-01-04
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-12-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 20, 2022)

Attorneys

Mario Murillo-Mora
Bradley PricePrice Law, PLC, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent