Did the lower court err for ruling that an administrative search, without a warrant, ostensibly conducted by a DEA Diversionary inspector was lawful to be utilized for a criminal prosecution?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . 1. Did the lower court err for ruling that an administrative search, without a warrant,ostensibly conducted by a DEA Diversionary inspector was lawful to be utilized for a criminal prosecution? 2. Did the lower court erroneously apply the law by using a total amount of 563,000 Oxycodone pills dispensed for legitimate and illegitimate purposes to determine Petitioner's years of imprisonment instead of 120,829 of Oxycodone pills which a DEA . inspector testified were filled with fraudulent prescriptions? 3. Did the lower court err for not making the writ of audita querela available to Petitioner to challenge a forfeiture monetary judgment when his counsel did not contest it at trial and direct appeal? . 4, Did the lower court misapply the law for permitting Petitioner's innocent and untainted personally legitimately earned money to be seized by the United States’ Government in partial fulfillment of a forfeiture monetary judgment? . i