Does it violate her right to a speedy trial

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. Does it go against her US. Const. Amend. Uh cight to 3 Speedy trial , that afi uxiting the cart Bhmes to request ene, violate her ? Does bec receiving NQ Mirarcla uacning Qo against her US. Const. Amend. Z right ¢ . A. Does Appellate cansel inknhonal det of caying her US. Const. Amends, IL, @, OUT in her vital Diect Appeal) bot inskad chose fo adaliess one unmerited sentence made at tial, then Filled his 39 page bef with empty Filer contining 213 ERRERS, violate her Us.const. Amerol. a right +o have an e fective Appellate counsel 7 3. foes Hol deurt counsel intentionally denying her Spay tial, He Miranda uaming ard als “having MO pelial Investoshon, Ho deEnse shaky, HO aduasacial esbing abi jibes, callet MO expert fixensic wrtnesses to canter atacke the Medical Examiner giving his opinisns and conclusions tejuots intenbenally ard being used as thelr bead, ballistic arcicrime Scene recastiuction expert, go against het US. Gast, fenct, TL right te have an eSeahue Wal counsel ? Pres his aiding their impossible manufaetured! Muickt scenario go against defending her ¢ ut, Does the Cumulative Efect of Error Constitute this gross intartsnal Injstee, by her denial of US:Const. Amends. IC GP, WMP, MZ ard hec Due Process rights: hel ng totally denied her From the very beginning by Render tt gusshoni ng her when she uas legally drunk Hat night ? Noes this make her Lagally Sist'fied Des Te Provocation based on all the blead and hallishe eviderce atallegect ax Z -r7