Has the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals effectively established a procedural rule to efface, abridge, or abrogate the Supreme Court's mandate(s), notice, warning, and opportunity of Castro v. United States, 540 U.S. 375 (2003); and rationales on nonfrivolous claims in Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473 (1983)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED , 1. HAS THE FIFTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS EFFECTIVELY ESTABLISHED A PROCEDURAL RULE TO EFFACE ,.astb! ABRIDGE, OR ABROGATE THE} SUPREME, COURT*S }-, \MANDATE[S{], “NOTICE,} WARNING, AND OPPORTUNITY, '! OF CASTRO V. UNITED STATES, 540 U.S. 375(2003); AND RATIONALES ON NONFRIVOLOUS CLAIMS IN SLACK V. MCDANIEL, 529 U.S. 473(1983); Loe 2